SGMAX vs. LVAFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SGMAX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund) and LVAFX (LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund) are both Global Equities funds from BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, SGMAX returned 10.63%/yr vs 8.24%/yr for LVAFX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SGMAX charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for LVAFX.

Performance

SGMAX vs. LVAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGMAX achieves a 7.38% return, which is significantly lower than LVAFX's 10.01% return.

SGMAX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -1.45%
• YTD: 7.38%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 16.43%
• 3Y*: 14.74%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: —

LVAFX

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -2.46%
• YTD: 10.01%
• 6M: 9.75%
• 1Y: 22.65%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: 8.24%
• 10Y*: 7.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGMAX vs. LVAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SGMAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund	7.38%	17.93%	15.18%	8.86%	-3.41%	18.94%	-2.71%	20.58%	-4.41%	17.10%
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund	10.01%	22.33%	0.10%	9.81%	-4.04%	17.36%	-5.16%	17.54%	-6.47%	18.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SGMAX and LVAFX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.94

The correlation between SGMAX and LVAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SGMAX vs. LVAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGMAX

SGMAX Risk / Return Rank: 61
SGMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SGMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SGMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
SGMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SGMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

LVAFX

LVAFX Risk / Return Rank: 84
LVAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
LVAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
LVAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
LVAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
LVAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGMAX vs. LVAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SGMAX	LVAFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.59	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	3.76	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.47	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	3.93	-1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.92	14.85	-3.92

SGMAX vs. LVAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the LVAFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGMAX and LVAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SGMAX vs. LVAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGMAX drawdown since its inception was -31.27%, smaller than the maximum LVAFX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGMAX and LVAFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGMAX	LVAFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.27%	-33.69%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	-5.76%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.57%	-17.52%	+5.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.11%	-18.34%	-3.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	-3.45%	+1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.79%	-4.74%	-0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	1.52%	-0.02%

Volatility

SGMAX vs. LVAFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX) is 2.01%, while LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that SGMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGMAX	LVAFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.01%	2.76%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.68%	6.48%	-0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.68%	8.73%	-1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.77%	13.25%	+0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.19%	13.59%	+0.60%

SGMAX vs. LVAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGMAX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LVAFX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGMAX vs. LVAFX - Dividend Comparison

SGMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.55%, more than LVAFX's 9.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund	9.25%	10.17%	2.71%	15.64%	2.90%	2.90%	2.14%	7.62%	3.59%	7.10%	1.66%	1.74%
SGMAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund	13.55%	14.55%	12.63%	6.40%	11.12%	15.38%	2.06%	4.81%	7.86%	4.45%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGMAX and LVAFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, SGMAX and LVAFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SGMAX or LVAFX?

LVAFX has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to SGMAX (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGMAX dropped -31.27% vs LVAFX's -33.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LVAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.