PORTX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
PORTX is managed by Trillium Mutual Funds. It was launched on Sep 29, 1999. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
PORTX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PORTX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | -7.91% | 1.15% | 7.67% | 19.02% | -24.04% | 22.16% | 24.56% | 28.20% | -7.24% | 27.89% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PORTX achieves a -7.91% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PORTX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 7.99%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
PORTX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -7.91%
- 6M
- -18.21%
- 1Y
- -4.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PORTX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PORTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PORTX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
PORTX
CSUAX
PORTX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PORTX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | 1.63 | -1.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | 2.17 | -2.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.32 | -0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 2.36 | -2.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 10.32 | -11.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PORTX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 1.63 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.61 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.55 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between PORTX and CSUAX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PORTX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
PORTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.61% | 5.84% | 3.55% | 2.61% | 1.85% | 2.32% | 4.50% | 2.46% | 4.66% | 5.86% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
PORTX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PORTX drawdown since its inception was -51.71%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PORTX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PORTX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.71% | -52.20% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.78% | -7.98% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.32% | -20.45% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.34% | -35.05% | +3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.78% | -4.38% | -16.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.73% | -8.49% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.48% | 1.83% | +5.65% |
Volatility
PORTX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that PORTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PORTX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 3.26% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 6.89% | +10.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.39% | 11.48% | +11.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 12.89% | +6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 14.89% | +3.24% |