PNQI vs. ROUS
PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PNQI tracks the NASDAQ Internet Index while ROUS tracks the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PNQI returned 11.84%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for ROUS. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ROUS.
Performance
PNQI vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 15.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PNQI has underperformed ROUS with an annualized return of 11.84%, while ROUS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.
PNQI
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- 6M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 1Y
- -5.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 25.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
PNQI vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -8.93% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 60.69% | -47.92% | -5.57% | 61.36% | 28.76% | -5.08% | 40.05% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 15.51% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 6.61% | 23.94% | -9.59% | 22.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNQI and ROUS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PNQI and ROUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PNQI vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PNQI
ROUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PNQI
ROUS
Communication Services
PNQI
ROUS
Consumer Cyclical
PNQI
ROUS
Financial Services
PNQI
ROUS
Real Estate
PNQI
ROUS
Healthcare
PNQI
ROUS
Industrials
PNQI
ROUS
Basic Materials
PNQI
-
ROUS
Consumer Defensive
PNQI
-
ROUS
Energy
PNQI
-
ROUS
Utilities
PNQI
-
ROUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNQI vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank
PNQI
ROUS
PNQI vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNQI | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.39 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 4.33 | -4.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 17.39 | -17.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNQI vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than ROUS's maximum drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and ROUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNQI | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -35.51% | -24.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.85% | -5.97% | -18.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | -15.81% | -9.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.56% | -18.91% | -40.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.70% | -35.51% | -24.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.93% | -1.76% | -12.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.99% | -4.21% | -8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.22% | 1.48% | +10.74% |
Volatility
PNQI vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.89%. This indicates that PNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNQI | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 2.89% | +4.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.96% | 8.92% | +7.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 11.61% | +7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.00% | 14.44% | +12.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 16.92% | +8.40% |
PNQI vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNQI vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison
PNQI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.34% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNQI and ROUS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNQI has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to ROUS (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs ROUS's -35.51%.
On 10-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.80% vs 11.84% for PNQI. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.
ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for PNQI.
PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.19% for ROUS.
ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNQI and ROUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer