PNQI vs. ROUS
PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PNQI tracks the NASDAQ Internet Index while ROUS tracks the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PNQI returned 11.73%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for ROUS. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ROUS.
Performance
PNQI vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -18.59% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 16.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PNQI has underperformed ROUS with an annualized return of 11.73%, while ROUS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.53% annualized return.
PNQI
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -8.54%
- YTD
- -18.59%
- 6M
- -19.34%
- 1Y
- -13.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- -3.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 16.35%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.53%
PNQI vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -18.59% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 60.69% | -47.92% | -5.57% | 61.36% | 28.76% | -5.08% | 40.05% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 16.35% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 6.61% | 23.94% | -9.59% | 22.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNQI and ROUS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PNQI and ROUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PNQI vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PNQI
ROUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PNQI
ROUS
Communication Services
PNQI
ROUS
Consumer Cyclical
PNQI
ROUS
Financial Services
PNQI
ROUS
Real Estate
PNQI
ROUS
Industrials
PNQI
ROUS
Healthcare
PNQI
ROUS
Basic Materials
PNQI
-
ROUS
Consumer Defensive
PNQI
-
ROUS
Energy
PNQI
-
ROUS
Utilities
PNQI
-
ROUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNQI vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank
PNQI
ROUS
PNQI vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNQI | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.43 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 4.80 | -5.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 19.27 | -20.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNQI vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than ROUS's maximum drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and ROUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNQI | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -35.51% | -24.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.85% | -5.97% | -18.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | -15.81% | -9.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.56% | -18.91% | -40.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.70% | -35.51% | -24.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.06% | -1.05% | -22.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.98% | -4.22% | -8.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.55% | 1.48% | +10.07% |
Volatility
PNQI vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 3.86%. This indicates that PNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNQI | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 3.86% | +3.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | 8.95% | +6.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.83% | 11.65% | +7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 14.43% | +12.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 16.98% | +8.34% |
PNQI vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNQI vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison
PNQI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.33% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNQI and ROUS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNQI has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to ROUS (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs ROUS's -35.51%.
On 10-year performance, ROUS leads with 13.53% vs 11.73% for PNQI. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.
ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for PNQI.
PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.19% for ROUS.
ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNQI and ROUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer