PNQI vs. FDN
PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) and FDN (First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PNQI tracks the NASDAQ Internet Index while FDN tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PNQI returned 11.74%/yr vs 13.59%/yr for FDN. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PNQI charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FDN.
Performance
PNQI vs. FDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -9.13% return, which is significantly lower than FDN's 2.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PNQI has underperformed FDN with an annualized return of 11.74%, while FDN has yielded a comparatively higher 13.59% annualized return.
PNQI
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- 6M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- -9.13%
- 1Y
- -4.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- -0.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.59%
FDN
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 3.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $116.36M | $88.95M | $109.31M | |
| $4.40M | $3.35M | $2.63M |
PNQI vs. FDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -9.13% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 60.69% | -47.92% | -5.57% | 61.36% | 28.76% | -5.08% | 40.05% |
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | 2.08% | 10.70% | 30.35% | 51.48% | -45.54% | 6.55% | 52.55% | 19.25% | 6.17% | 37.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNQI and FDN is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2008 | 0.91 |
The correlation between PNQI and FDN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
PNQI vs. FDN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PNQI
FDN
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PNQI
FDN
Communication Services
PNQI
FDN
Consumer Cyclical
PNQI
FDN
Financial Services
PNQI
FDN
Real Estate
PNQI
FDN
-
Healthcare
PNQI
FDN
Industrials
PNQI
FDN
Basic Materials
PNQI
-
FDN
-
Consumer Defensive
PNQI
-
FDN
-
Energy
PNQI
-
FDN
-
Utilities
PNQI
-
FDN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNQI vs. FDN — Risk / Return Rank
PNQI
FDN
PNQI vs. FDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNQI | FDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.02 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 0.02 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 0.04 | -0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNQI vs. FDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, roughly equal to the maximum FDN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and FDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNQI | FDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -61.55% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.85% | -21.31% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.85% | -24.98% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.34% | -53.97% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.70% | -53.97% | -5.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.12% | -5.17% | -8.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.00% | -11.79% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.67% | 8.91% | +3.76% |
Volatility
PNQI vs. FDN - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) at 5.93%. This indicates that PNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNQI | FDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 5.93% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | 16.19% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.14% | 20.42% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.04% | 27.42% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 25.65% | -0.28% |
PNQI vs. FDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FDN's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNQI vs. FDN - Dividend Comparison
Neither PNQI nor FDN has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNQI and FDN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNQI has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to FDN (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs FDN's -61.55%.
On 10-year performance, FDN leads with 13.59% vs 11.74% for PNQI. On fees, FDN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FDN has been the lower-risk option at 5.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDN has performed better with a 13.59% return vs 11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.
PNQI and FDN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index, while FDN tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.49% for FDN.
FDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNQI and FDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer