PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNQI vs. XNTK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PNQI vs. XNTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -9.55% return, which is significantly lower than XNTK's 39.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PNQI has underperformed XNTK with an annualized return of 12.05%, while XNTK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.76% annualized return.


PNQI

1D
-2.20%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
-9.55%
6M
-10.27%
1Y
-0.73%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
12.05%

XNTK

1D
2.68%
1M
22.48%
YTD
39.42%
6M
38.46%
1Y
78.56%
3Y*
43.30%
5Y*
21.80%
10Y*
25.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNQI vs. XNTK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
-9.55%15.56%29.44%60.69%-47.92%-5.57%61.36%28.76%-5.08%40.05%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
39.42%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PNQI and XNTK is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2008

0.82

The correlation between PNQI and XNTK shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PNQI vs. XNTK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PNQI
XNTK

Technology

38.5%
80.9%

Communication Services

30.8%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

27.7%
9.3%

Financial Services

2.6%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Industrials

0.1%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

PNQI
38.5%
XNTK
80.9%

Communication Services

PNQI
30.8%
XNTK
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PNQI
27.7%
XNTK
9.3%

Financial Services

PNQI
2.6%
XNTK

-

Real Estate

PNQI
0.4%
XNTK

-

Industrials

PNQI
0.1%
XNTK

-

Healthcare

PNQI
0.0%
XNTK

-

Basic Materials

PNQI

-

XNTK

-

Consumer Defensive

PNQI

-

XNTK

-

Energy

PNQI

-

XNTK

-

Utilities

PNQI

-

XNTK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNQI vs. XNTK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNQI
PNQI Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNQI vs. XNTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PNQIXNTKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.04

3.39

-3.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.07

3.98

-3.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.54

-0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

4.69

-4.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.02

15.66

-15.68

PNQI vs. XNTK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNQI Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the XNTK Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNQI and XNTK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PNQIXNTKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

3.39

-3.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.79

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.97

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.45

+0.08

Drawdowns

PNQI vs. XNTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, smaller than the maximum XNTK drawdown of -72.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and XNTK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PNQIXNTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.70%

-72.38%

+12.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.85%

-17.00%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.85%

-28.11%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.56%

-48.28%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.70%

-48.28%

-11.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.52%

0.00%

-14.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.96%

-21.30%

+8.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.47%

5.09%

+5.38%

Volatility

PNQI vs. XNTK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) is 4.39%, while SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that PNQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PNQIXNTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

7.52%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.76%

18.05%

-4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.99%

23.29%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.81%

27.91%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.29%

26.64%

-1.35%

PNQI vs. XNTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than XNTK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PNQI vs. XNTK - Dividend Comparison

PNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than XNTK's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
0.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.16%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


PNQI and XNTK have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to PNQI (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs XNTK's -72.38%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.76% vs 12.05% for PNQI. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PNQI has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.76% return vs 12.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.

XNTK has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.02% for PNQI.

PNQI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XNTK is Technology Equities. PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index, while XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.35% for XNTK.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PNQI and XNTK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer