PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNQI vs. ROBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PNQI vs. ROBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNQI achieves a -10.23% return, which is significantly lower than ROBO's 12.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PNQI having a 11.79% annualized return and ROBO not far ahead at 11.99%.


PNQI

1D
-1.43%
1M
6.64%
6M
-7.45%
YTD
-10.23%
1Y
-7.64%
3Y*
13.16%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
11.79%

ROBO

1D
-1.89%
1M
-7.19%
6M
5.11%
YTD
12.38%
1Y
27.00%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNQI vs. ROBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
-10.23%15.56%29.44%60.69%-47.92%-5.57%61.36%28.76%-5.08%40.05%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
12.38%23.71%-1.28%23.74%-33.92%15.34%45.26%29.51%-20.92%44.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PNQI and ROBO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between PNQI and ROBO has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PNQI vs. ROBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PNQI
ROBO

Technology

39.8%
43.6%

Communication Services

30.4%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

27.0%
3.1%

Financial Services

2.4%
1.9%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Healthcare

0.0%
4.6%

Industrials

0.0%
45.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

1.3%

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

PNQI
39.8%
ROBO
43.6%

Communication Services

PNQI
30.4%
ROBO
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PNQI
27.0%
ROBO
3.1%

Financial Services

PNQI
2.4%
ROBO
1.9%

Real Estate

PNQI
0.4%
ROBO

-

Healthcare

PNQI
0.0%
ROBO
4.6%

Industrials

PNQI
0.0%
ROBO
45.3%

Basic Materials

PNQI

-

ROBO

-

Consumer Defensive

PNQI

-

ROBO
1.3%

Energy

PNQI

-

ROBO

-

Utilities

PNQI

-

ROBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNQI vs. ROBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNQI
PNQI Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBO
ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNQI vs. ROBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PNQIROBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.19

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

1.56

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.62

5.20

-5.83

PNQI vs. ROBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNQI Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the ROBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNQI and ROBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PNQI vs. ROBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNQI drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than ROBO's maximum drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNQI and ROBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PNQIROBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.70%

-43.65%

-16.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.85%

-17.35%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.85%

-27.92%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.56%

-43.65%

-15.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.70%

-43.65%

-16.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.15%

-13.78%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.99%

-12.88%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.25%

5.20%

+7.05%

Volatility

PNQI vs. ROBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) is 7.61%, while ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) has a volatility of 10.33%. This indicates that PNQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PNQIROBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

10.33%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.95%

22.07%

-6.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

26.15%

-6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.00%

24.33%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.32%

23.41%

+1.91%

PNQI vs. ROBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNQI has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PNQI vs. ROBO - Dividend Comparison

PNQI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
0.38%0.42%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.18%0.20%0.37%0.37%0.02%0.19%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


PNQI and ROBO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBO has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to PNQI (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNQI dropped -59.70% vs ROBO's -43.65%.

On 10-year performance, ROBO leads with 11.99% vs 11.79% for PNQI. On fees, PNQI is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, PNQI has been the lower-risk option at 7.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROBO has performed better with a 11.99% return vs 11.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PNQI is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

ROBO has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for PNQI.

PNQI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ROBO is Robotics. PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index, while ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PNQI and 0.95% for ROBO.

ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PNQI and ROBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer