PNGAY vs. ASHR

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PNGAY (Ping An Insurance Company of China) is a stock, while ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index. Over the past 10 years, PNGAY returned 9.07%/yr vs 4.89%/yr for ASHR. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.

Performance

PNGAY vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ping An Insurance Company of China (PNGAY) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNGAY achieves a -8.11% return, which is significantly lower than ASHR's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PNGAY has outperformed ASHR with an annualized return of 9.07%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively lower 4.89% annualized return.

PNGAY

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: 11.60%
• 6M: -16.74%
• YTD: -8.11%
• 1Y: 16.59%
• 3Y*: 8.65%
• 5Y*: 2.82%
• 10Y*: 9.07%
• ALL TIME*: 2.16%

ASHR

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -2.73%
• 6M: 2.27%
• YTD: 4.11%
• 1Y: 23.78%
• 3Y*: 8.75%
• 5Y*: -0.35%
• 10Y*: 4.89%
• ALL TIME*: 5.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF	$123.30M	$155.65M	$161.34M
PNGAY Ping An Insurance Company of China	$4.40M	$4.01M	$3.32M

PNGAY vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PNGAY Ping An Insurance Company of China	-8.11%	52.29%	38.53%	-27.60%	-2.17%	-39.34%	5.51%	39.67%	-15.03%	113.23%
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF	4.11%	27.02%	11.95%	-12.52%	-27.52%	-1.57%	36.29%	36.50%	-28.45%	33.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PNGAY and ASHR is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013	0.61

The correlation between PNGAY and ASHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PNGAY vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PNGAY

PNGAY Risk / Return Rank: 59
PNGAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
PNGAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
PNGAY Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PNGAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
PNGAY Martin Ratio Rank: 57

ASHR

ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 54
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PNGAY vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ping An Insurance Company of China (PNGAY) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PNGAY	ASHR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	1.18	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	1.73	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.21	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	2.38	-1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.11	6.99	-5.87

PNGAY vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNGAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the ASHR Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNGAY and ASHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PNGAY vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNGAY drawdown since its inception was -78.52%, which is greater than ASHR's maximum drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNGAY and ASHR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PNGAY	ASHR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.52%	-51.30%	-27.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.52%	-9.84%	-18.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.26%	-33.12%	-11.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.82%	-44.10%	-7.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.83%	-51.30%	-15.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.64%	-20.23%	-6.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.71%	-29.03%	-13.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.81%	3.34%	+9.47%

Volatility

PNGAY vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ping An Insurance Company of China (PNGAY) is 4.87%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) has a volatility of 8.68%. This indicates that PNGAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PNGAY	ASHR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.87%	8.68%	-3.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.50%	15.50%	+3.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.58%	19.86%	+5.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.74%	23.98%	+16.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.68%	24.20%	+10.48%

Dividends

PNGAY vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

PNGAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than ASHR's 2.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF	2.22%	2.31%	1.13%	2.48%	1.13%	0.88%	0.81%	0.98%	1.32%	0.84%	0.73%	30.13%
PNGAY Ping An Insurance Company of China	5.22%	4.23%	5.81%	7.66%	5.81%	4.47%	2.05%	1.88%	2.35%	1.17%	3.03%	1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PNGAY and ASHR in my portfolio?

PNGAY and ASHR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PNGAY or ASHR?

ASHR has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to PNGAY (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNGAY dropped -78.52% vs ASHR's -51.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.