PNGAY vs. BACHY
Compare and contrast key facts about Ping An Insurance Company of China (PNGAY) and Bank of China Ltd ADR (BACHY).
Performance
PNGAY vs. BACHY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PNGAY vs. BACHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNGAY Ping An Insurance Company of China | -7.64% | 52.29% | 38.53% | -27.60% | -2.17% | -39.34% | 5.51% | 39.67% | -15.03% | 113.23% |
BACHY Bank of China Ltd ADR | 12.04% | 23.87% | 43.09% | 14.58% | 10.54% | 14.31% | -14.46% | 4.65% | -8.11% | 15.60% |
Fundamentals
PNGAY:
$140.32B
BACHY:
$213.58B
PNGAY:
$14.91
BACHY:
$18.86
PNGAY:
1.04
BACHY:
0.85
PNGAY:
0.13
BACHY:
0.15
PNGAY:
0.14
BACHY:
0.23
PNGAY:
0.14
BACHY:
0.07
PNGAY:
$1.00T
BACHY:
$889.75B
PNGAY:
$999.77B
BACHY:
$610.13B
PNGAY:
$122.48B
BACHY:
$392.96B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNGAY achieves a -7.64% return, which is significantly lower than BACHY's 12.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PNGAY has underperformed BACHY with an annualized return of 9.42%, while BACHY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.
PNGAY
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -10.47%
- YTD
- -7.64%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 36.78%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- -3.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
BACHY
- 1D
- 5.75%
- 1M
- 8.50%
- YTD
- 12.04%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 11.11%
- 3Y*
- 29.11%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNGAY vs. BACHY — Risk / Return Rank
PNGAY
BACHY
PNGAY vs. BACHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ping An Insurance Company of China (PNGAY) and Bank of China Ltd ADR (BACHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PNGAY | BACHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 0.53 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 0.91 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.11 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 0.97 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | 2.89 | +2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PNGAY | BACHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 0.53 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 1.07 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.62 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.40 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between PNGAY and BACHY is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PNGAY vs. BACHY - Dividend Comparison
PNGAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than BACHY's 5.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNGAY Ping An Insurance Company of China | 4.58% | 4.23% | 5.81% | 7.66% | 5.81% | 4.47% | 2.05% | 1.88% | 2.35% | 1.17% | 3.03% | 1.99% |
BACHY Bank of China Ltd ADR | 5.01% | 8.52% | 6.46% | 8.92% | 9.64% | 8.57% | 7.99% | 5.32% | 5.42% | 4.08% | 11.53% | 7.39% |
Drawdowns
PNGAY vs. BACHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNGAY drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than BACHY's maximum drawdown of -53.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNGAY and BACHY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNGAY | BACHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.80% | -53.68% | -38.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.83% | -13.78% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.87% | -16.91% | -46.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.83% | -40.98% | -25.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.27% | 0.00% | -26.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.00% | -20.08% | -22.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.39% | 5.28% | +1.11% |
Volatility
PNGAY vs. BACHY - Volatility Comparison
Ping An Insurance Company of China (PNGAY) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to Bank of China Ltd ADR (BACHY) at 6.95%. This indicates that PNGAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BACHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PNGAY | BACHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | 6.95% | +4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.49% | 12.08% | +8.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.98% | 21.21% | +8.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.81% | 19.50% | +21.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.77% | 20.69% | +14.08% |
Financials
PNGAY vs. BACHY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ping An Insurance Company of China and Bank of China Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PNGAY vs. BACHY - Profitability Comparison
PNGAY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ping An Insurance Company of China reported a gross profit of 234.96B and revenue of 234.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
BACHY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank of China Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 161.85B and revenue of 298.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
PNGAY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ping An Insurance Company of China reported an operating income of 4.50B and revenue of 234.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
BACHY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank of China Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 72.95B and revenue of 298.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.4%.
PNGAY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ping An Insurance Company of China reported a net income of 1.90B and revenue of 234.96B, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.
BACHY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank of China Ltd ADR reported a net income of 60.07B and revenue of 298.45B, resulting in a net margin of 20.1%.