PLTM vs. MSFL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL).

PLTM and MSFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLTM is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. MSFL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Mar 15, 2024.

Performance

PLTM vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PLTM vs. MSFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	-4.46%	124.46%	-1.36%
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	-44.17%	16.99%	-9.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTM achieves a -4.46% return, which is significantly higher than MSFL's -44.17% return.

PLTM

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -14.98%
• YTD: -4.46%
• 6M: 25.33%
• 1Y: 97.59%
• 3Y*: 24.84%
• 5Y*: 9.58%
• 10Y*: —

MSFL

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -14.81%
• YTD: -44.17%
• 6M: -52.78%
• 1Y: -17.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTM vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFL's 1.15% expense ratio.

MSFL

GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF

PLTM

GraniteShares Platinum Trust

Return for Risk

PLTM vs. MSFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM

PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 83
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

MSFL

MSFL Risk / Return Rank: 7
MSFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
MSFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
MSFL Omega Ratio Rank: 7
MSFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
MSFL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTM vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTM	MSFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	-0.34	+2.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	-0.16	+2.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.98	+0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	-0.25	+2.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.21	-0.62	+8.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTM vs. MSFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the MSFL Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTM and MSFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTM	MSFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97	-0.34	+2.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	-0.47	+0.74

Correlation

The correlation between PLTM and MSFL is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PLTM vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLTM nor MSFL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PLTM vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTM drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum MSFL drawdown of -59.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTM and MSFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTM	MSFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.32%	-59.39%	+17.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.52%	-59.39%	+24.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.43%	-56.49%	+27.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.35%	-19.49%	+1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.53%	23.86%	-12.33%

Volatility

PLTM vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) has a higher volatility of 13.81% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) at 12.60%. This indicates that PLTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTM	MSFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.81%	12.60%	+1.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.47%	39.11%	+6.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.89%	52.79%	-2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.38%	47.86%	-15.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.81%	47.86%	-17.05%