PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MSFL vs. MSFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MSFL and MSFX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

MSFL vs. MSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-9.34%
-11.37%
MSFL
MSFX

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

MSFL:

41.98%

MSFX:

42.86%

Max Drawdown

MSFL:

-29.48%

MSFX:

-30.86%

Current Drawdown

MSFL:

-29.22%

MSFX:

-30.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFL achieves a -7.70% return, which is significantly higher than MSFX's -8.39% return.


MSFL

YTD

-7.70%

1M

-17.15%

6M

-9.34%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MSFX

YTD

-8.39%

1M

-17.41%

6M

-11.37%

1Y

-15.61%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSFL vs. MSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFX's 1.05% expense ratio.


MSFL
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF
Expense ratio chart for MSFL: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for MSFX: current value at 1.05% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.05%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSFL vs. MSFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFL

MSFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFX is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFX is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFX is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFX is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFX is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFX is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MSFL vs. MSFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
MSFL
MSFX


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

MSFL vs. MSFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSFL nor MSFX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MSFL vs. MSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, roughly equal to the maximum MSFX drawdown of -30.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and MSFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-29.22%
-30.83%
MSFL
MSFX

Volatility

MSFL vs. MSFX - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) have volatilities of 16.56% and 16.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
16.56%
16.66%
MSFL
MSFX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab