PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MSFL vs. FBL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MSFLFBL
Daily Std Dev39.00%71.12%
Max Drawdown-29.48%-35.25%
Current Drawdown-16.78%-7.34%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between MSFL and FBL is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MSFL vs. FBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-1.32%
3.26%
MSFL
FBL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSFL vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSFL and FBL have an expense ratio of 1.15%.


MSFL
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF
Expense ratio chart for MSFL: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for FBL: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSFL vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFL
Sharpe ratio
No data
FBL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBL, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBL, currently valued at 2.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.40
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FBL, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBL, currently valued at 3.26, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FBL, currently valued at 8.97, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.97

MSFL vs. FBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

MSFL vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison

MSFL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.07%.


TTM2023
MSFL
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
28.07%51.58%

Drawdowns

MSFL vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum FBL drawdown of -35.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and FBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-16.78%
-7.34%
MSFL
FBL

Volatility

MSFL vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) is 10.24%, while GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a volatility of 12.67%. This indicates that MSFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
10.24%
12.67%
MSFL
FBL