PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLSIX vs. URINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLSIX vs. URINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund (PLSIX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLSIX achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than URINX's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PLSIX has underperformed URINX with an annualized return of 5.01%, while URINX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.58% annualized return.


PLSIX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.17%
6M
2.21%
YTD
3.62%
1Y
8.22%
3Y*
8.80%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
5.01%
ALL TIME*
2.83%

URINX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.08%
6M
3.96%
YTD
5.89%
1Y
11.59%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
5.58%
ALL TIME*
6.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PLSIX vs. URINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLSIX
Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund
3.62%10.46%8.16%10.93%-13.11%4.40%10.19%12.77%-3.15%8.73%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.89%12.36%6.66%10.79%-10.38%6.47%8.74%11.72%-3.00%8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PLSIX and URINX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2008

0.92

The correlation between PLSIX and URINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLSIX vs. URINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLSIX
PLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

URINX
URINX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
URINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
URINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
URINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
URINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLSIX vs. URINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund (PLSIX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLSIXURINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.99

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

12.61

-4.44

PLSIX vs. URINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the URINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLSIX and URINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLSIX vs. URINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLSIX drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than URINX's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLSIX and URINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLSIXURINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.52%

-15.27%

-25.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.30%

-3.92%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.88%

-4.84%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-15.27%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.93%

-15.27%

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.38%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-1.90%

-4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.93%

+0.07%

Volatility

PLSIX vs. URINX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund (PLSIX) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) at 1.38%. This indicates that PLSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLSIXURINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.38%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.81%

4.82%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.75%

5.63%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.92%

6.37%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.92%

5.87%

+0.05%

PLSIX vs. URINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLSIX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than URINX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PLSIX vs. URINX - Dividend Comparison

PLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, less than URINX's 5.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLSIX
Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund
5.59%5.79%6.17%2.59%5.27%7.76%3.80%5.45%7.67%4.76%2.50%2.11%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.82%6.07%4.22%3.48%6.63%6.66%3.97%6.37%6.11%5.68%3.34%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PLSIX and URINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLSIX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to URINX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLSIX dropped -40.52% vs URINX's -15.27%.

URINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLSIX and URINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer