PLSIX vs. PBCKX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PLSIX (Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund) and PBCKX (Principal Blue Chip Fund) are both mutual funds - PLSIX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal, while PBCKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, PLSIX returned 4.96%/yr vs 15.76%/yr for PBCKX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PLSIX charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PBCKX.

Performance

PLSIX vs. PBCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund (PLSIX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLSIX achieves a 3.54% return, which is significantly higher than PBCKX's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PLSIX has underperformed PBCKX with an annualized return of 4.96%, while PBCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.76% annualized return.

PLSIX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -0.25%
• 6M: 2.21%
• YTD: 3.54%
• 1Y: 8.13%
• 3Y*: 8.60%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: 4.96%
• ALL TIME*: 2.83%

PBCKX

• 1D: 2.08%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: -0.54%
• YTD: -2.47%
• 1Y: -3.06%
• 3Y*: 14.84%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: 15.76%
• ALL TIME*: 15.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PLSIX Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PLSIX vs. PBCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLSIX Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund	3.54%	10.46%	8.16%	10.93%	-13.11%	4.40%	10.19%	12.77%	-3.15%	8.73%
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	-2.47%	9.20%	26.90%	40.58%	-30.74%	25.05%	34.77%	45.22%	2.83%	28.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PLSIX and PBCKX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2012	0.78

The correlation between PLSIX and PBCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PLSIX vs. PBCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLSIX

PLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 49
PLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
PLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

PBCKX

PBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 2
PBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLSIX vs. PBCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund (PLSIX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLSIX	PBCKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	-0.32	+1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	-0.33	+2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.96	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	-0.27	+2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.90	-0.76	+8.66

PLSIX vs. PBCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the PBCKX Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLSIX and PBCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLSIX vs. PBCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLSIX drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than PBCKX's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLSIX and PBCKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLSIX	PBCKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.52%	-38.00%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.30%	-19.10%	+14.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.88%	-19.10%	+13.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.93%	-38.00%	+20.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.93%	-38.00%	+20.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-6.17%	+5.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.63%	-5.66%	-0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	6.87%	-5.87%

Volatility

PLSIX vs. PBCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund (PLSIX) is 1.54%, while Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that PLSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLSIX	PBCKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	4.86%	-3.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.81%	13.43%	-8.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.76%	16.32%	-10.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.92%	20.52%	-13.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.92%	20.23%	-14.31%

PLSIX vs. PBCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLSIX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PBCKX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLSIX vs. PBCKX - Dividend Comparison

PLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, less than PBCKX's 20.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	20.45%	19.94%	9.01%	0.51%	0.71%	6.67%	3.28%	8.90%	7.86%	2.79%	1.01%	2.40%
PLSIX Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund	5.59%	5.79%	6.17%	2.59%	5.27%	7.76%	3.80%	5.45%	7.67%	4.76%	2.50%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLSIX and PBCKX in my portfolio?

PLSIX and PBCKX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLSIX or PBCKX?

PBCKX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to PLSIX (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLSIX dropped -40.52% vs PBCKX's -38.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.