PLSE vs. BABA
PLSE (Pulse Biosciences, Inc.) and BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) are both stocks. PLSE operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while BABA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, PLSE returned 22.44%/yr vs 4.48%/yr for BABA. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PLSE vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLSE achieves a 155.86% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -15.83% return. Over the past 10 years, PLSE has outperformed BABA with an annualized return of 22.44%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively lower 4.48% annualized return.
PLSE
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 20.29%
- 6M
- 154.01%
- YTD
- 155.86%
- 1Y
- 138.17%
- 3Y*
- 68.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 22.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.35%
BABA
- 1D
- 5.10%
- 1M
- 27.16%
- 6M
- -27.24%
- YTD
- -15.83%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- -7.82%
- 10Y*
- 4.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.13B | $1.37B | $1.51B | |
| $15.34M | $10.96M | $10.12M |
PLSE vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLSE Pulse Biosciences, Inc. | 155.86% | -21.14% | 42.24% | 341.88% | -81.30% | -37.93% | 77.93% | 17.02% | -51.44% | 263.08% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -15.83% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLSE and BABA is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2016 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
PLSE:
$2.43B
BABA:
$293.02B
PLSE:
-$1.10
BABA:
CN¥33.85
PLSE:
3.16K
BABA:
2.45
PLSE:
35.92
BABA:
1.89
PLSE:
$751.00K
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
PLSE:
-$684.00K
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
PLSE:
-$73.79M
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLSE vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
PLSE
BABA
PLSE vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLSE | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.05 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 0.05 | +3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 0.09 | +7.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLSE vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLSE drawdown since its inception was -97.22%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLSE and BABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLSE | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.22% | -80.09% | -17.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.51% | -49.47% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.06% | -49.47% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.38% | -68.54% | -26.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.22% | -80.09% | -17.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.65% | -59.04% | +38.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.36% | -37.84% | -21.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.27% | 24.79% | -6.52% |
Volatility
PLSE vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) has a higher volatility of 18.97% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 14.17%. This indicates that PLSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLSE | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.97% | 14.17% | +4.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.87% | 29.11% | +42.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.43% | 45.09% | +42.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.50% | 51.60% | +45.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.04% | 43.64% | +48.40% |
Dividends
PLSE vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
PLSE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.86% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% |
PLSE Pulse Biosciences, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PLSE vs. BABA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pulse Biosciences, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PLSE and BABA have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLSE has higher volatility (18.97%) compared to BABA (14.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLSE dropped -97.22% vs BABA's -80.09%.
PLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLSE and BABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer