PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLSE vs. SMMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLSE vs. SMMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) and Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLSE achieves a 82.01% return, which is significantly higher than SMMT's -13.84% return. Over the past 10 years, PLSE has outperformed SMMT with an annualized return of 19.02%, while SMMT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.76% annualized return.


PLSE

1D
2.92%
1M
24.76%
YTD
82.01%
6M
85.25%
1Y
41.75%
3Y*
57.47%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
19.02%

SMMT

1D
1.41%
1M
-11.25%
YTD
-13.84%
6M
-17.96%
1Y
-26.92%
3Y*
102.68%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
5.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLSE vs. SMMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLSE
Pulse Biosciences, Inc.
82.01%-21.14%42.24%341.88%-81.30%-37.93%77.93%17.02%-51.44%263.08%
SMMT
Summit Therapeutics Inc.
-13.84%-1.99%583.72%-38.59%57.99%-42.77%193.75%39.13%-89.62%29.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PLSE and SMMT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016

0.15

The correlation between PLSE and SMMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLSE:

$1.69B

SMMT:

$11.69B

EPS

PLSE:

-$1.11

SMMT:

-$1.60

PB Ratio

PLSE:

25.55

SMMT:

21.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLSE:

$751.00K

SMMT:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLSE:

-$684.00K

SMMT:

-$83.36K

EBITDA (TTM)

PLSE:

-$73.79M

SMMT:

-$738.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLSE vs. SMMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLSE
PLSE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMT
SMMT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SMMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLSE vs. SMMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) and Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLSESMMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.00

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

-0.51

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.21

-0.80

+3.00

PLSE vs. SMMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the SMMT Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLSE and SMMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLSESMMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

-0.36

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.07

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.04

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.03

+0.19

Drawdowns

PLSE vs. SMMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLSE drawdown since its inception was -97.22%, roughly equal to the maximum SMMT drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLSE and SMMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLSESMMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.22%

-95.75%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.51%

-52.76%

+16.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.90%

-62.26%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.38%

-91.78%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.22%

-95.75%

-1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.55%

-58.94%

+15.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.75%

-57.64%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.04%

33.88%

-14.84%

Volatility

PLSE vs. SMMT - Volatility Comparison

Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) has a higher volatility of 28.86% compared to Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) at 22.87%. This indicates that PLSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLSESMMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.86%

22.87%

+5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.05%

56.77%

+12.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.91%

77.69%

+7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.99%

185.11%

-87.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.70%

144.64%

-52.94%

Dividends

PLSE vs. SMMT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLSE nor SMMT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PLSE vs. SMMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pulse Biosciences, Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00K1.00M20222023202420252026
401.00K
0
(PLSE) Total Revenue
(SMMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PLSE and SMMT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLSE has higher volatility (28.86%) compared to SMMT (22.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLSE dropped -97.22% vs SMMT's -95.75%.

PLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLSE and SMMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer