PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLSE vs. NEON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLSE vs. NEON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) and Neonode Inc. (NEON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLSE achieves a 76.84% return, which is significantly higher than NEON's -5.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PLSE has outperformed NEON with an annualized return of 18.68%, while NEON has yielded a comparatively lower -20.99% annualized return.


PLSE

1D
-1.58%
1M
16.56%
YTD
76.84%
6M
86.91%
1Y
43.84%
3Y*
55.96%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
18.68%

NEON

1D
-0.61%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
-5.75%
6M
-25.11%
1Y
-84.56%
3Y*
-41.96%
5Y*
-23.08%
10Y*
-20.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLSE vs. NEON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLSE
Pulse Biosciences, Inc.
76.84%-21.14%42.24%341.88%-81.30%-37.93%77.93%17.02%-51.44%263.08%
NEON
Neonode Inc.
-5.75%-78.86%259.39%-58.36%-37.85%31.11%247.94%16.87%-77.66%-59.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PLSE and NEON is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLSE:

$1.65B

NEON:

$27.52M

EPS

PLSE:

-$1.11

NEON:

$0.50

PS Ratio

PLSE:

2.18K

NEON:

12.72

PB Ratio

PLSE:

24.83

NEON:

1.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLSE:

$751.00K

NEON:

$2.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLSE:

-$684.00K

NEON:

$1.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

PLSE:

-$73.79M

NEON:

$7.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLSE vs. NEON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLSE
PLSE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

NEON
NEON Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NEON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEON Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEON Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NEON Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEON Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLSE vs. NEON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) and Neonode Inc. (NEON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLSENEONDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

-0.69

+1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

-1.00

+2.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.84

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

-0.88

+1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.12

-1.05

+3.17

PLSE vs. NEON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the NEON Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLSE and NEON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLSENEONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

-0.69

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

-0.22

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

-0.21

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.22

+0.43

Drawdowns

PLSE vs. NEON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLSE drawdown since its inception was -97.22%, roughly equal to the maximum NEON drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLSE and NEON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLSENEONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.22%

-99.93%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.51%

-95.67%

+59.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.90%

-95.67%

+39.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.38%

-95.67%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.22%

-95.67%

-1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.15%

-99.90%

+54.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.76%

-96.76%

+37.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.03%

79.87%

-60.84%

Volatility

PLSE vs. NEON - Volatility Comparison

Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) has a higher volatility of 29.21% compared to Neonode Inc. (NEON) at 23.16%. This indicates that PLSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLSENEONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.21%

23.16%

+6.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.11%

42.67%

+26.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.91%

123.05%

-38.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.98%

107.56%

-9.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.71%

98.85%

-7.14%

Dividends

PLSE vs. NEON - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLSE nor NEON has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PLSE vs. NEON - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pulse Biosciences, Inc. and Neonode Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00K1.00M1.50M2.00M20222023202420252026
401.00K
614.00K
(PLSE) Total Revenue
(NEON) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PLSE and NEON have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLSE has higher volatility (29.21%) compared to NEON (23.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLSE dropped -97.22% vs NEON's -99.93%.

PLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLSE and NEON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer