PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLSE vs. LUMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLSE vs. LUMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) and Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLSE achieves a 155.86% return, which is significantly higher than LUMN's -17.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PLSE has outperformed LUMN with an annualized return of 22.44%, while LUMN has yielded a comparatively lower -9.37% annualized return.


PLSE

1D
0.26%
1M
20.29%
6M
154.01%
YTD
155.86%
1Y
138.17%
3Y*
68.45%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
22.44%
ALL TIME*
23.35%

LUMN

1D
-2.74%
1M
-0.78%
6M
-27.66%
YTD
-17.89%
1Y
71.97%
3Y*
46.48%
5Y*
-10.65%
10Y*
-9.37%
ALL TIME*
6.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$70.00M$71.60M$116.26M
$15.34M$10.96M$10.12M

PLSE vs. LUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLSE
Pulse Biosciences, Inc.
155.86%-21.14%42.24%341.88%-81.30%-37.93%77.93%17.02%-51.44%263.08%
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
-17.89%46.33%190.16%-64.94%-55.48%38.82%-19.18%-5.22%2.00%-21.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PLSE and LUMN is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2016

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLSE:

$2.43B

LUMN:

$6.57B

EPS

PLSE:

-$1.10

LUMN:

-$1.74

PS Ratio

PLSE:

3.16K

LUMN:

0.52

PB Ratio

PLSE:

35.92

LUMN:

0.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLSE:

$751.00K

LUMN:

$12.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLSE:

-$684.00K

LUMN:

$1.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

PLSE:

-$73.79M

LUMN:

$1.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLSE vs. LUMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLSE
PLSE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

LUMN
LUMN Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLSE vs. LUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) and Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLSELUMNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.17

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

0.91

+2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

1.51

+5.85

PLSE vs. LUMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the LUMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLSE and LUMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLSE vs. LUMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLSE drawdown since its inception was -97.22%, roughly equal to the maximum LUMN drawdown of -95.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLSE and LUMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLSELUMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.22%

-95.26%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.51%

-47.68%

+11.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.06%

-69.66%

+15.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.38%

-92.51%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.22%

-94.44%

-2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.65%

-69.13%

+48.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.36%

-27.79%

-31.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.27%

28.96%

-10.69%

Volatility

PLSE vs. LUMN - Volatility Comparison

Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) has a higher volatility of 18.97% compared to Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) at 15.66%. This indicates that PLSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLSELUMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.97%

15.66%

+3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.87%

56.04%

+15.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.43%

81.06%

+6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.50%

85.67%

+11.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.04%

67.82%

+24.22%

Dividends

PLSE vs. LUMN - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLSE nor LUMN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.37%7.97%10.26%7.57%14.26%12.95%9.08%8.59%
PLSE
Pulse Biosciences, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PLSE vs. LUMN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pulse Biosciences, Inc. and Lumen Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PLSE and LUMN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLSE has higher volatility (18.97%) compared to LUMN (15.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLSE dropped -97.22% vs LUMN's -95.26%.

PLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLSE and LUMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer