PLOW vs. CDP
PLOW (Douglas Dynamics, Inc.) and CDP (COPT Defense Properties) are both stocks. PLOW operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while CDP operates in REIT - Office (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, PLOW returned 8.66%/yr vs 6.60%/yr for CDP. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLOW vs. CDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with PLOW at 33.73% and CDP at 33.73%. Over the past 10 years, PLOW has outperformed CDP with an annualized return of 8.66%, while CDP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.60% annualized return.
PLOW
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -8.13%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- YTD
- 33.73%
- 1Y
- 46.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
CDP
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 6.52%
- 6M
- 24.96%
- YTD
- 33.73%
- 1Y
- 34.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- 6.60%
PLOW vs. CDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLOW Douglas Dynamics, Inc. | 33.73% | 43.83% | -16.47% | -14.72% | -4.01% | -6.11% | -19.64% | 57.21% | -2.68% | 15.63% |
CDP COPT Defense Properties | 33.73% | -6.17% | 26.17% | 3.65% | -3.26% | 11.61% | -7.07% | 45.28% | -24.78% | -3.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLOW and CDP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
PLOW:
$996.23M
CDP:
$4.13B
PLOW:
$272.40
CDP:
$2.06
PLOW:
0.16
CDP:
17.69
PLOW:
0.01
CDP:
0.75
PLOW:
1.50
CDP:
3.56
PLOW:
0.00
CDP:
0.01
PLOW:
$678.78M
CDP:
$776.70M
PLOW:
$181.26M
CDP:
$326.28M
PLOW:
$96.05M
CDP:
$368.96M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLOW vs. CDP — Risk / Return Rank
PLOW
CDP
PLOW vs. CDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and COPT Defense Properties (CDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLOW | CDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 3.22 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 8.65 | -2.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLOW vs. CDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLOW drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, smaller than the maximum CDP drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLOW and CDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLOW | CDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.53% | -59.36% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.65% | -10.71% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.38% | -23.66% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.68% | -23.66% | -24.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.53% | -48.67% | -6.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.52% | -3.19% | -17.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.30% | -19.83% | +1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.07% | 3.97% | +3.10% |
Volatility
PLOW vs. CDP - Volatility Comparison
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) has a higher volatility of 13.45% compared to COPT Defense Properties (CDP) at 6.39%. This indicates that PLOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLOW | CDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.45% | 6.39% | +7.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.84% | 13.72% | +15.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.30% | 18.49% | +15.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 23.09% | +9.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.00% | 26.35% | +8.65% |
Dividends
PLOW vs. CDP - Dividend Comparison
PLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than CDP's 3.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDP COPT Defense Properties | 3.43% | 4.39% | 3.81% | 4.45% | 4.24% | 3.93% | 4.22% | 3.74% | 5.23% | 3.77% | 3.52% | 5.04% |
PLOW Douglas Dynamics, Inc. | 2.74% | 3.61% | 4.99% | 3.98% | 3.21% | 2.92% | 2.62% | 1.98% | 2.95% | 2.54% | 2.79% | 4.22% |
Financials
PLOW vs. CDP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Douglas Dynamics, Inc. and COPT Defense Properties. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PLOW and CDP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLOW has higher volatility (13.45%) compared to CDP (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLOW dropped -55.53% vs CDP's -59.36%.
CDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLOW and CDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer