PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLOW vs. CDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLOW vs. CDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and COPT Defense Properties (CDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLOW achieves a 54.84% return, which is significantly higher than CDP's 22.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PLOW has outperformed CDP with an annualized return of 10.83%, while CDP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.08% annualized return.


PLOW

1D
0.97%
1M
13.56%
YTD
54.84%
6M
49.66%
1Y
82.83%
3Y*
24.80%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
10.83%

CDP

1D
0.51%
1M
4.86%
YTD
22.45%
6M
21.82%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
6.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLOW vs. CDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLOW
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
54.84%43.83%-16.47%-14.72%-4.01%-6.11%-19.64%57.21%-2.68%15.63%
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
22.45%-6.17%26.17%3.65%-3.26%11.61%-7.07%45.28%-24.78%-3.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PLOW and CDP is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLOW:

$1.18B

CDP:

$15.90M

EPS

PLOW:

$272.12

CDP:

$1.83

PE Ratio

PLOW:

0.18

CDP:

18.36

PEG Ratio

PLOW:

0.01

CDP:

0.78

PS Ratio

PLOW:

1.73

CDP:

3.69

PB Ratio

PLOW:

0.00

CDP:

0.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLOW:

$678.78M

CDP:

$776.70M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLOW:

$181.26M

CDP:

$326.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

PLOW:

$96.05M

CDP:

$368.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLOW vs. CDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLOW
PLOW Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PLOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PLOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CDP
CDP Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDP Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDP Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLOW vs. CDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and COPT Defense Properties (CDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLOWCDPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.23

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.42

2.18

+3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.60

5.78

+6.81

PLOW vs. CDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the CDP Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLOW and CDP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLOW vs. CDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLOW drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, smaller than the maximum CDP drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLOW and CDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLOWCDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.53%

-59.36%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.37%

-10.71%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.38%

-23.66%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.68%

-23.66%

-24.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.53%

-48.67%

-6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-2.46%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-19.86%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.60%

4.03%

+2.57%

Volatility

PLOW vs. CDP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) is 6.19%, while COPT Defense Properties (CDP) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that PLOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLOWCDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

6.58%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.32%

13.90%

+12.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.34%

18.07%

+14.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.61%

23.09%

+9.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.83%

26.33%

+8.50%

Dividends

PLOW vs. CDP - Dividend Comparison

PLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than CDP's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
3.67%4.39%3.81%4.45%4.24%3.93%4.22%3.74%5.23%3.77%3.52%5.04%
PLOW
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
2.37%3.61%4.99%3.98%3.21%2.92%2.62%1.98%2.95%2.54%2.79%4.22%

Financials

PLOW vs. CDP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Douglas Dynamics, Inc. and COPT Defense Properties. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00M180.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
137.80M
200.64M
(PLOW) Total Revenue
(CDP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PLOW and CDP have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDP has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to PLOW (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLOW dropped -55.53% vs CDP's -59.36%.

PLOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLOW and CDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer