PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDP vs. HIW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CDP vs. HIW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COPT Defense Properties (CDP) and Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDP achieves a 22.45% return, which is significantly higher than HIW's 18.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CDP has outperformed HIW with an annualized return of 6.08%, while HIW has yielded a comparatively lower 0.44% annualized return.


CDP

1D
0.51%
1M
4.86%
YTD
22.45%
6M
21.82%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
6.08%

HIW

1D
0.34%
1M
14.54%
YTD
18.63%
6M
19.98%
1Y
0.50%
3Y*
20.35%
5Y*
-1.84%
10Y*
0.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDP vs. HIW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
22.45%-6.17%26.17%3.65%-3.26%11.61%-7.07%45.28%-24.78%-3.24%
HIW
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
18.63%-9.61%43.11%-10.14%-33.58%17.63%-14.76%31.82%-20.84%3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CDP and HIW is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 1994

0.55

The correlation between CDP and HIW shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.69 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CDP:

$15.90M

HIW:

$3.29B

EPS

CDP:

$1.83

HIW:

$0.55

PE Ratio

CDP:

18.36

HIW:

53.55

PS Ratio

CDP:

3.69

HIW:

5.37

PB Ratio

CDP:

0.01

HIW:

1.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

CDP:

$776.70M

HIW:

$605.73M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CDP:

$326.28M

HIW:

$409.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

CDP:

$368.96M

HIW:

$478.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDP vs. HIW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDP
CDP Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDP Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDP Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

HIW
HIW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIW Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIW Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDP vs. HIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COPT Defense Properties (CDP) and Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDPHIWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.03

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

0.01

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

0.03

+5.75

CDP vs. HIW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDP Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the HIW Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDP and HIW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDP vs. HIW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDP drawdown since its inception was -59.36%, smaller than the maximum HIW drawdown of -63.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDP and HIW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDPHIWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.36%

-63.47%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-34.03%

+23.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.66%

-37.09%

+13.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.66%

-58.22%

+34.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.67%

-58.93%

+10.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-15.24%

+12.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.86%

-14.58%

-5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

16.91%

-12.88%

Volatility

CDP vs. HIW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for COPT Defense Properties (CDP) is 6.58%, while Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that CDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDPHIWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

7.35%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.90%

23.31%

-9.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.07%

27.21%

-9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.09%

30.28%

-7.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.33%

30.58%

-4.25%

Dividends

CDP vs. HIW - Dividend Comparison

CDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than HIW's 6.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
3.67%4.39%3.81%4.45%4.24%3.93%4.22%3.74%5.23%3.77%3.52%5.04%
HIW
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
6.81%7.75%6.54%8.71%7.15%4.40%4.84%3.88%4.78%3.46%4.90%3.90%

Financials

CDP vs. HIW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between COPT Defense Properties and Highwoods Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
200.64M
0
(CDP) Total Revenue
(HIW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CDP and HIW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIW has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to CDP (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDP dropped -59.36% vs HIW's -63.47%.

CDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDP and HIW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer