PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLOW vs. STAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLOW vs. STAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLOW achieves a 54.84% return, which is significantly higher than STAG's 6.09% return. Over the past 10 years, PLOW has outperformed STAG with an annualized return of 10.83%, while STAG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.11% annualized return.


PLOW

1D
0.97%
1M
13.56%
YTD
54.84%
6M
49.66%
1Y
82.83%
3Y*
24.80%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
10.83%

STAG

1D
2.06%
1M
1.13%
YTD
6.09%
6M
5.47%
1Y
9.80%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
10.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLOW vs. STAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLOW
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
54.84%43.83%-16.47%-14.72%-4.01%-6.11%-19.64%57.21%-2.68%15.63%
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
6.09%13.30%-10.34%26.73%-29.66%59.10%4.18%33.20%-3.81%20.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PLOW and STAG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2011

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLOW:

$1.18B

STAG:

$7.38B

EPS

PLOW:

$272.12

STAG:

$1.30

PE Ratio

PLOW:

0.18

STAG:

29.77

PEG Ratio

PLOW:

0.01

STAG:

3.78

PS Ratio

PLOW:

1.73

STAG:

8.41

PB Ratio

PLOW:

0.00

STAG:

2.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLOW:

$678.78M

STAG:

$863.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLOW:

$181.26M

STAG:

$356.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

PLOW:

$96.05M

STAG:

$598.36M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLOW vs. STAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLOW
PLOW Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PLOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PLOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

STAG
STAG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
STAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
STAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
STAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
STAG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLOW vs. STAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLOWSTAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.10

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.42

1.04

+4.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.60

2.51

+10.08

PLOW vs. STAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the STAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLOW and STAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLOW vs. STAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLOW drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, which is greater than STAG's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLOW and STAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLOWSTAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.53%

-45.08%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.37%

-9.44%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.38%

-24.59%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.68%

-42.22%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.53%

-45.08%

-10.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-3.93%

+2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-10.49%

-7.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.60%

3.90%

+2.70%

Volatility

PLOW vs. STAG - Volatility Comparison

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) have volatilities of 6.19% and 6.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLOWSTAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

6.49%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.32%

14.28%

+12.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.34%

19.90%

+12.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.61%

23.44%

+9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.83%

26.20%

+8.63%

Dividends

PLOW vs. STAG - Dividend Comparison

PLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than STAG's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLOW
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
2.37%3.61%4.99%3.98%3.21%2.92%2.62%1.98%2.95%2.54%2.79%4.22%
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
3.26%4.05%4.38%3.74%4.52%3.02%4.60%4.53%5.71%5.14%5.82%7.40%

Financials

PLOW vs. STAG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Douglas Dynamics, Inc. and STAG Industrial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
137.80M
224.21M
(PLOW) Total Revenue
(STAG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PLOW and STAG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STAG has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to PLOW (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLOW dropped -55.53% vs STAG's -45.08%.

PLOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLOW and STAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer