PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDP vs. PLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CDP vs. PLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COPT Defense Properties (CDP) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDP achieves a 22.45% return, which is significantly higher than PLD's 14.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CDP has underperformed PLD with an annualized return of 6.08%, while PLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.78% annualized return.


CDP

1D
0.51%
1M
4.86%
YTD
22.45%
6M
21.82%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
6.08%

PLD

1D
2.34%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
14.40%
6M
14.46%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
10.63%
5Y*
6.52%
10Y*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDP vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
22.45%-6.17%26.17%3.65%-3.26%11.61%-7.07%45.28%-24.78%-3.24%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
14.40%25.08%-18.12%21.58%-31.33%72.33%14.74%55.87%-6.25%25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CDP and PLD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 1997

0.55

The correlation between CDP and PLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CDP:

$15.90M

PLD:

$137.73B

EPS

CDP:

$1.83

PLD:

$3.88

PE Ratio

CDP:

18.36

PLD:

37.03

PS Ratio

CDP:

3.69

PLD:

15.38

PB Ratio

CDP:

0.01

PLD:

2.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

CDP:

$776.70M

PLD:

$8.95B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CDP:

$326.28M

PLD:

$3.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

CDP:

$368.96M

PLD:

$7.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDP vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDP
CDP Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDP Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDP Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PLD
PLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDP vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COPT Defense Properties (CDP) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDPPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

4.24

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

13.95

-8.17

CDP vs. PLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDP Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the PLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDP and PLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDP vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDP drawdown since its inception was -59.36%, smaller than the maximum PLD drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDP and PLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDPPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.36%

-84.70%

+25.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-9.59%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.66%

-31.37%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.66%

-43.30%

+19.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.67%

-43.30%

-5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-5.30%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.86%

-17.35%

-2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

2.91%

+1.12%

Volatility

CDP vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for COPT Defense Properties (CDP) is 6.58%, while Prologis, Inc. (PLD) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that CDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDPPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

7.46%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.90%

15.05%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.07%

21.90%

-3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.09%

26.98%

-3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.33%

27.04%

-0.71%

Dividends

CDP vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison

CDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than PLD's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
3.67%4.39%3.81%4.45%4.24%3.93%4.22%3.74%5.23%3.77%3.52%5.04%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
2.89%3.16%3.63%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%

Financials

CDP vs. PLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between COPT Defense Properties and Prologis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
200.64M
2.30B
(CDP) Total Revenue
(PLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CDP vs. PLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between COPT Defense Properties and Prologis, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
98.5%
10.1%
Portfolio components
CDP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, COPT Defense Properties reported a gross profit of 197.64M and revenue of 200.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.5%.

PLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 232.54M and revenue of 2.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.

CDP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, COPT Defense Properties reported an operating income of 119.20M and revenue of 200.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.4%.

PLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported an operating income of 827.03M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.

CDP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, COPT Defense Properties reported a net income of 38.56M and revenue of 200.64M, resulting in a net margin of 19.2%.

PLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a net income of 981.98M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in a net margin of 42.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CDP and PLD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLD has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to CDP (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDP dropped -59.36% vs PLD's -84.70%.

PLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDP and PLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer