CDP vs. LMT
CDP (COPT Defense Properties) and LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) are both stocks. CDP operates in REIT - Office (Real Estate), while LMT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CDP returned 6.08%/yr vs 10.37%/yr for LMT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CDP vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDP achieves a 22.45% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 3.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CDP has underperformed LMT with an annualized return of 6.08%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.
CDP
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 22.45%
- 6M
- 21.82%
- 1Y
- 23.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.08%
LMT
- 1D
- -3.40%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 3.28%
- 1Y
- 7.73%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
CDP vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDP COPT Defense Properties | 22.45% | -6.17% | 26.17% | 3.65% | -3.26% | 11.61% | -7.07% | 45.28% | -24.78% | -3.24% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 3.26% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | 3.15% | -6.49% | 52.55% | -16.35% | 31.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDP and LMT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1991 | 0.20 |
The correlation between CDP and LMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.25 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CDP:
$15.90M
LMT:
$114.07B
CDP:
$1.83
LMT:
$20.61
CDP:
18.36
LMT:
23.95
CDP:
3.69
LMT:
1.53
CDP:
0.01
LMT:
15.23
CDP:
$776.70M
LMT:
$75.12B
CDP:
$326.28M
LMT:
$7.37B
CDP:
$368.96M
LMT:
$8.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDP vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank
CDP
LMT
CDP vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COPT Defense Properties (CDP) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDP | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.08 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 0.29 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.78 | 0.71 | +5.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDP vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDP drawdown since its inception was -59.36%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDP and LMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDP | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.36% | -79.29% | +19.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -26.58% | +15.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.66% | -31.79% | +8.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.66% | -31.79% | +8.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.67% | -36.67% | -12.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -26.58% | +24.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.86% | -26.83% | +6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 10.93% | -6.90% |
Volatility
CDP vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for COPT Defense Properties (CDP) is 6.58%, while Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that CDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDP | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 8.79% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.90% | 20.75% | -6.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.07% | 26.48% | -8.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.09% | 23.13% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.33% | 23.84% | +2.49% |
Dividends
CDP vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
CDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than LMT's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDP COPT Defense Properties | 3.67% | 4.39% | 3.81% | 4.45% | 4.24% | 3.93% | 4.22% | 3.74% | 5.23% | 3.77% | 3.52% | 5.04% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.77% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
Financials
CDP vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between COPT Defense Properties and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CDP vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison
CDP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, COPT Defense Properties reported a gross profit of 197.64M and revenue of 200.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.5%.
LMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.
CDP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, COPT Defense Properties reported an operating income of 119.20M and revenue of 200.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.4%.
LMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
CDP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, COPT Defense Properties reported a net income of 38.56M and revenue of 200.64M, resulting in a net margin of 19.2%.
LMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CDP and LMT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMT has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to CDP (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDP dropped -59.36% vs LMT's -79.29%.
CDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDP and LMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer