PLOW vs. AUBN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PLOW (Douglas Dynamics, Inc.) and AUBN (Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc.) are both stocks. PLOW operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while AUBN operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, PLOW returned 11.22%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for AUBN. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PLOW vs. AUBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLOW achieves a 38.14% return, which is significantly higher than AUBN's -2.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PLOW has outperformed AUBN with an annualized return of 11.22%, while AUBN has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.

PLOW

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 38.14%
• 6M: 42.10%
• 1Y: 67.70%
• 3Y*: 19.14%
• 5Y*: 4.20%
• 10Y*: 11.22%

AUBN

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: 10.00%
• YTD: -2.59%
• 6M: 5.77%
• 1Y: 31.70%
• 3Y*: 10.12%
• 5Y*: -3.25%
• 10Y*: 2.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLOW vs. AUBN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLOW Douglas Dynamics, Inc.	38.14%	43.83%	-16.47%	-14.72%	-4.01%	-6.11%	-19.64%	57.21%	-2.68%	15.63%
AUBN Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc.	-2.59%	20.17%	16.32%	-2.81%	-25.99%	-20.35%	-19.63%	71.98%	-16.65%	27.56%

Correlation

The correlation between PLOW and AUBN is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2010	0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap PLOW : $1.06B AUBN : $90.77M
EPS PLOW : $272.12 AUBN : $2.27
PE Ratio PLOW : 0.16 AUBN : 11.45
PEG Ratio PLOW : 0.01 AUBN : 0.15
PS Ratio PLOW : 1.56 AUBN : 2.31
PB Ratio PLOW : 0.00 AUBN : 0.98
Total Revenue (TTM) PLOW : $678.78M AUBN : $39.23M
Gross Profit (TTM) PLOW : $181.26M AUBN : $33.06M
EBITDA (TTM) PLOW : $96.05M AUBN : $10.60M

Return for Risk

PLOW vs. AUBN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLOW

PLOW Risk / Return Rank: 88
PLOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PLOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PLOW Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PLOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PLOW Martin Ratio Rank: 88

AUBN

AUBN Risk / Return Rank: 64
AUBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
AUBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
AUBN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
AUBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
AUBN Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLOW vs. AUBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLOW	AUBN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	0.73	+1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	1.23	+1.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.17	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.43	1.30	+3.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.69	3.05	+7.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLOW vs. AUBN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the AUBN Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLOW and AUBN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLOW	AUBN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	0.73	+1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	-0.10	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.05	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.11	+0.30

Drawdowns

PLOW vs. AUBN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLOW drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, smaller than the maximum AUBN drawdown of -83.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLOW and AUBN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLOW	AUBN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.53%	-83.53%	+28.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.37%	-24.48%	+9.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.38%	-24.48%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.68%	-50.08%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.53%	-69.42%	+13.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.75%	-48.07%	+36.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.36%	-44.14%	+25.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.35%	10.43%	-4.08%

Volatility

PLOW vs. AUBN - Volatility Comparison

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) has a higher volatility of 18.86% compared to Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN) at 5.35%. This indicates that PLOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLOW	AUBN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.86%	5.35%	+13.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.54%	31.10%	-4.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.29%	43.56%	-11.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.73%	32.72%	+0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.85%	38.70%	-3.85%

Dividends

PLOW vs. AUBN - Dividend Comparison

PLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than AUBN's 4.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUBN Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc.	4.16%	4.01%	4.60%	5.08%	4.61%	3.22%	2.45%	1.89%	3.03%	2.37%	2.87%	2.97%
PLOW Douglas Dynamics, Inc.	2.64%	3.61%	4.99%	3.98%	3.21%	2.92%	2.62%	1.98%	2.95%	2.54%	2.79%	4.22%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLOW and AUBN in my portfolio?

PLOW and AUBN have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLOW or AUBN?

PLOW has higher volatility (18.86%) compared to AUBN (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLOW dropped -55.53% vs AUBN's -83.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.