PLOW vs. AUBN
Compare and contrast key facts about Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN).
Performance
PLOW vs. AUBN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLOW vs. AUBN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLOW Douglas Dynamics, Inc. | 29.84% | 43.83% | -16.47% | -14.72% | -4.01% | -6.11% | -19.64% | 57.21% | -2.68% | 15.63% |
AUBN Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. | -10.45% | 20.17% | 16.32% | -2.81% | -25.99% | -20.35% | -19.63% | 71.98% | -16.65% | 27.56% |
Fundamentals
PLOW:
$992.36M
AUBN:
$83.45M
PLOW:
$1.99
AUBN:
$2.08
PLOW:
21.19
AUBN:
11.50
PLOW:
0.78
AUBN:
0.15
PLOW:
1.51
AUBN:
2.02
PLOW:
3.53
AUBN:
0.93
PLOW:
$656.05M
AUBN:
$41.22M
PLOW:
$173.15M
AUBN:
$32.16M
PLOW:
$88.97M
AUBN:
$10.24M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLOW achieves a 29.84% return, which is significantly higher than AUBN's -10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PLOW has outperformed AUBN with an annualized return of 9.84%, while AUBN has yielded a comparatively lower 1.54% annualized return.
PLOW
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- 29.84%
- 6M
- 36.81%
- 1Y
- 87.68%
- 3Y*
- 14.33%
- 5Y*
- 1.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
AUBN
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -14.22%
- 1Y
- 15.57%
- 3Y*
- 6.88%
- 5Y*
- -5.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLOW vs. AUBN — Risk / Return Rank
PLOW
AUBN
PLOW vs. AUBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLOW | AUBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.25 | 0.35 | +2.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.39 | 0.79 | +3.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.11 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.74 | 0.63 | +6.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | 1.66 | +14.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLOW | AUBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25 | 0.35 | +2.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | -0.16 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.04 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.10 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLOW and AUBN is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PLOW vs. AUBN - Dividend Comparison
PLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than AUBN's 4.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLOW Douglas Dynamics, Inc. | 2.80% | 3.61% | 4.99% | 3.98% | 3.21% | 2.92% | 2.62% | 1.98% | 2.95% | 2.54% | 2.79% | 4.22% |
AUBN Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. | 4.53% | 4.01% | 4.60% | 5.08% | 4.61% | 3.22% | 2.45% | 1.89% | 3.03% | 2.37% | 2.87% | 2.97% |
Drawdowns
PLOW vs. AUBN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLOW drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, smaller than the maximum AUBN drawdown of -83.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLOW and AUBN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLOW | AUBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.53% | -83.53% | +28.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -24.48% | +11.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.14% | -51.03% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.53% | -69.42% | +13.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.59% | -52.26% | +42.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -44.10% | +25.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.46% | 9.29% | -3.83% |
Volatility
PLOW vs. AUBN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) is 9.09%, while Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN) has a volatility of 20.39%. This indicates that PLOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLOW | AUBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 20.39% | -11.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.99% | 33.16% | -14.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.14% | 44.11% | -16.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.58% | 32.93% | -1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 38.77% | -4.37% |
Financials
PLOW vs. AUBN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Douglas Dynamics, Inc. and Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PLOW vs. AUBN - Profitability Comparison
PLOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Douglas Dynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.61M and revenue of 184.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.
AUBN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.68M and revenue of 8.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.8%.
PLOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Douglas Dynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of 19.33M and revenue of 184.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
AUBN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.12M and revenue of 8.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.
PLOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Douglas Dynamics, Inc. reported a net income of 12.84M and revenue of 184.54M, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
AUBN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. reported a net income of 1.67M and revenue of 8.47M, resulting in a net margin of 19.7%.