PLOW vs. ABM
Compare and contrast key facts about Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM).
Performance
PLOW vs. ABM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLOW vs. ABM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLOW Douglas Dynamics, Inc. | 29.84% | 43.83% | -16.47% | -14.72% | -4.01% | -6.11% | -19.64% | 57.21% | -2.68% | 15.63% |
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated | -8.34% | -15.53% | 16.35% | 3.04% | 10.73% | 9.81% | 2.14% | 20.39% | -13.05% | -6.13% |
Fundamentals
PLOW:
$992.36M
ABM:
$2.34B
PLOW:
$1.99
ABM:
$2.54
PLOW:
21.19
ABM:
15.18
PLOW:
0.78
ABM:
0.46
PLOW:
1.51
ABM:
0.27
PLOW:
3.53
ABM:
1.36
PLOW:
$656.05M
ABM:
$8.87B
PLOW:
$173.15M
ABM:
$776.00M
PLOW:
$88.97M
ABM:
$392.60M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLOW achieves a 29.84% return, which is significantly higher than ABM's -8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PLOW has outperformed ABM with an annualized return of 9.84%, while ABM has yielded a comparatively lower 3.88% annualized return.
PLOW
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- 29.84%
- 6M
- 36.81%
- 1Y
- 87.68%
- 3Y*
- 14.33%
- 5Y*
- 1.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
ABM
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -13.44%
- YTD
- -8.34%
- 6M
- -15.45%
- 1Y
- -16.76%
- 3Y*
- -2.99%
- 5Y*
- -3.60%
- 10Y*
- 3.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLOW vs. ABM — Risk / Return Rank
PLOW
ABM
PLOW vs. ABM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLOW | ABM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.25 | -0.55 | +3.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.39 | -0.57 | +4.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 0.92 | +0.57 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.74 | -0.60 | +7.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | -1.24 | +17.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLOW | ABM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25 | -0.55 | +3.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | -0.12 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.12 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.29 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLOW and ABM is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PLOW vs. ABM - Dividend Comparison
PLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, which matches ABM's 2.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLOW Douglas Dynamics, Inc. | 2.80% | 3.61% | 4.99% | 3.98% | 3.21% | 2.92% | 2.62% | 1.98% | 2.95% | 2.54% | 2.79% | 4.22% |
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated | 2.82% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.76% | 1.86% | 1.47% | 2.40% | 2.18% | 1.80% | 1.62% | 1.69% |
Drawdowns
PLOW vs. ABM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLOW drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, smaller than the maximum ABM drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLOW and ABM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLOW | ABM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.53% | -59.64% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -27.81% | +14.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.14% | -34.37% | -14.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.53% | -52.00% | -3.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.59% | -32.39% | +22.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -14.75% | -3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.46% | 13.43% | -7.97% |
Volatility
PLOW vs. ABM - Volatility Comparison
Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) at 8.45%. This indicates that PLOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLOW | ABM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 8.45% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.99% | 22.06% | -3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.14% | 30.53% | -3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.58% | 30.99% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.40% | 33.75% | +0.65% |
Financials
PLOW vs. ABM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Douglas Dynamics, Inc. and ABM Industries Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PLOW vs. ABM - Profitability Comparison
PLOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Douglas Dynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.61M and revenue of 184.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.
ABM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ABM Industries Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PLOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Douglas Dynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of 19.33M and revenue of 184.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
ABM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ABM Industries Incorporated reported an operating income of 74.70M and revenue of 2.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
PLOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Douglas Dynamics, Inc. reported a net income of 12.84M and revenue of 184.54M, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
ABM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ABM Industries Incorporated reported a net income of 38.80M and revenue of 2.24B, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.