PLOW vs. ABM
PLOW (Douglas Dynamics, Inc.) and ABM (ABM Industries Incorporated) are both stocks. PLOW operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while ABM operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PLOW returned 10.93%/yr vs 4.29%/yr for ABM. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLOW vs. ABM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLOW achieves a 56.17% return, which is significantly higher than ABM's 6.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PLOW has outperformed ABM with an annualized return of 10.93%, while ABM has yielded a comparatively lower 4.29% annualized return.
PLOW
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 14.54%
- YTD
- 56.17%
- 6M
- 51.94%
- 1Y
- 77.78%
- 3Y*
- 25.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
ABM
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 1.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.50%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
PLOW vs. ABM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLOW Douglas Dynamics, Inc. | 56.17% | 43.83% | -16.47% | -14.72% | -4.01% | -6.11% | -19.64% | 57.21% | -2.68% | 15.63% |
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated | 6.86% | -15.53% | 16.35% | 3.04% | 10.73% | 9.81% | 2.14% | 20.39% | -13.05% | -6.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLOW and ABM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010 | 0.43 |
Fundamentals
PLOW:
$1.19B
ABM:
$2.63B
PLOW:
$272.12
ABM:
$2.59
PLOW:
0.18
ABM:
17.20
PLOW:
0.01
ABM:
0.53
PLOW:
1.75
ABM:
0.30
PLOW:
0.00
ABM:
1.51
PLOW:
$678.78M
ABM:
$9.05B
PLOW:
$181.26M
ABM:
$1.04B
PLOW:
$96.05M
ABM:
$398.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLOW vs. ABM — Risk / Return Rank
PLOW
ABM
PLOW vs. ABM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) and ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLOW | ABM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.04 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.09 | 0.06 | +5.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.83 | 0.12 | +11.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLOW vs. ABM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLOW drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, smaller than the maximum ABM drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLOW and ABM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLOW | ABM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.53% | -59.64% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.37% | -23.78% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.38% | -34.37% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.68% | -34.37% | -13.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.53% | -52.00% | -3.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -21.18% | +20.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.32% | -14.82% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.60% | 12.24% | -5.64% |
Volatility
PLOW vs. ABM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) is 6.30%, while ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that PLOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLOW | ABM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 10.08% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.36% | 19.39% | +6.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.26% | 27.77% | +4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.60% | 31.05% | +1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.83% | 33.85% | +0.98% |
Dividends
PLOW vs. ABM - Dividend Comparison
PLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than ABM's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated | 2.49% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.76% | 1.86% | 1.47% | 2.40% | 2.18% | 1.80% | 1.62% | 1.69% |
PLOW Douglas Dynamics, Inc. | 2.35% | 3.61% | 4.99% | 3.98% | 3.21% | 2.92% | 2.62% | 1.98% | 2.95% | 2.54% | 2.79% | 4.22% |
Financials
PLOW vs. ABM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Douglas Dynamics, Inc. and ABM Industries Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PLOW and ABM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABM has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to PLOW (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLOW dropped -55.53% vs ABM's -59.64%.
PLOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLOW and ABM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer