PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDP vs. CLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CDP vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COPT Defense Properties (CDP) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CDP vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
11.22%-6.17%26.17%11.38%
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
0.86%4.23%5.26%2.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDP achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than CLIP's 0.86% return.


CDP

1D
-0.03%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
11.22%
6M
7.56%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
5.89%

CLIP

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.86%
6M
1.89%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDP vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDP
CDP Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDP Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CLIP
CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDP vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COPT Defense Properties (CDP) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDPCLIPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

13.56

-12.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

40.64

-39.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

11.02

-9.86

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

74.34

-72.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.29

595.00

-590.70

CDP vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDP Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 13.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDP and CLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDPCLIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

13.56

-12.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

10.60

-10.35

Correlation

The correlation between CDP and CLIP is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

CDP vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

CDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, which matches CLIP's 4.03% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
4.04%4.39%3.81%4.45%4.24%3.93%4.22%3.74%5.23%3.77%3.52%5.04%
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
4.03%4.14%5.11%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CDP vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDP drawdown since its inception was -59.36%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDP and CLIP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CDPCLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.36%

-0.08%

-59.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-0.05%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

0.00%

-5.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.98%

0.00%

-19.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

0.01%

+4.25%

Volatility

CDP vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

COPT Defense Properties (CDP) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.05%. This indicates that CDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CDPCLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

0.05%

+4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

0.15%

+12.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.42%

0.30%

+19.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.19%

0.45%

+22.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.29%

0.45%

+25.84%