PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDP vs. CLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDP vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COPT Defense Properties (CDP) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDP achieves a 22.45% return, which is significantly higher than CLIP's 1.71% return.


CDP

1D
0.51%
1M
4.86%
YTD
22.45%
6M
21.82%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
6.08%

CLIP

1D
0.03%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.82%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDP vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
22.45%-6.17%26.17%11.15%
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.71%4.23%5.26%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CDP and CLIP is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDP vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDP
CDP Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDP Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDP Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

CLIP
CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDP vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COPT Defense Properties (CDP) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDPCLIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-79.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

26.48

-25.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

142.41

-140.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

1,288.03

-1,282.24

CDP vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDP Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDP and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDP vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDP drawdown since its inception was -59.36%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDP and CLIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDPCLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.36%

-0.08%

-59.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-0.03%

-10.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.66%

-0.08%

-23.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

0.00%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.86%

-0.00%

-19.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

0.00%

+4.03%

Volatility

CDP vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

COPT Defense Properties (CDP) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.07%. This indicates that CDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDPCLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

0.07%

+6.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.90%

0.15%

+13.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.07%

0.22%

+17.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.09%

0.44%

+22.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.33%

0.44%

+25.89%

Dividends

CDP vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

CDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than CLIP's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
3.67%4.39%3.81%4.45%4.24%3.93%4.22%3.74%5.23%3.77%3.52%5.04%
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.90%4.14%5.11%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDP and CLIP have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDP has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to CLIP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDP dropped -59.36% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.97 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDP and CLIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer