PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKW vs. FVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKW vs. FVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, PKW has outperformed FVD with an annualized return of 12.81%, while FVD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.30% annualized return.


PKW

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
2.43%
6M
3.41%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
12.81%

FVD

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.80%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
8.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKW vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
2.43%17.92%17.33%17.24%-10.21%32.62%8.41%34.09%-10.53%17.75%
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.21%8.16%10.04%4.11%-5.18%25.08%-0.02%26.58%-3.49%12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PKW and FVD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2006

0.84

The correlation between PKW and FVD shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PKW vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PKW
FVD

Financial Services

29.4%
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

19.1%
5.6%

Industrials

14.2%
14.2%

Technology

10.8%
6.1%

Healthcare

10.1%
7.8%

Energy

5.6%
4.0%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
11.6%

Utilities

2.1%
18.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.1%

Real Estate

0.3%
8.1%

Financial Services

PKW
29.4%
FVD
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PKW
19.1%
FVD
5.6%

Industrials

PKW
14.2%
FVD
14.2%

Technology

PKW
10.8%
FVD
6.1%

Healthcare

PKW
10.1%
FVD
7.8%

Energy

PKW
5.6%
FVD
4.0%

Communication Services

PKW
4.0%
FVD
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

PKW
3.4%
FVD
11.6%

Utilities

PKW
2.1%
FVD
18.4%

Basic Materials

PKW
1.1%
FVD
2.1%

Real Estate

PKW
0.3%
FVD
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKW vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKW
PKW Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKW Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKW Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKW vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PKWFVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.13

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

0.95

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

2.58

+3.88

PKW vs. FVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the FVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKW and FVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PKWFVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

0.72

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.41

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.54

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.58

-0.06

Drawdowns

PKW vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, which is greater than FVD's maximum drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and FVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKWFVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.59%

-51.00%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-7.23%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-11.97%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

-16.41%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-35.25%

-5.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-5.96%

+3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-5.44%

-2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.66%

-0.17%

Volatility

PKW vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) at 2.62%. This indicates that PKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKWFVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

2.62%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

6.73%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.14%

9.50%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

12.76%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

15.44%

+4.34%

PKW vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKW vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison

PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than FVD's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.31%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
0.90%0.99%0.86%1.17%1.22%0.72%1.48%1.30%1.30%0.65%1.59%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKW and FVD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKW has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKW dropped -54.59% vs FVD's -51.00%.

On 10-year performance, PKW leads with 12.81% vs 8.30% for FVD. On fees, FVD is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PKW has performed better with a 12.81% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FVD is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.

FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.90% for PKW.

PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.61% for FVD.

PKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKW and FVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer