PKB vs. ESPO
PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PKB returned 16.59%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for ESPO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PKB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
PKB vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -15.10% return.
PKB
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 34.86%
- 3Y*
- 27.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
ESPO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- -15.10%
- 6M
- -16.17%
- 1Y
- -14.92%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- —
PKB vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 14.33% | 22.47% | 20.24% | 55.29% | -24.88% | 32.96% | 24.49% | 40.15% | -14.12% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -15.10% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKB and ESPO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between PKB and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PKB vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PKB
ESPO
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Industrials
PKB
ESPO
-
Basic Materials
PKB
ESPO
-
Consumer Cyclical
PKB
ESPO
Utilities
PKB
ESPO
-
Financial Services
PKB
ESPO
-
Communication Services
PKB
-
ESPO
Consumer Defensive
PKB
-
ESPO
-
Energy
PKB
-
ESPO
-
Healthcare
PKB
-
ESPO
-
Real Estate
PKB
-
ESPO
-
Technology
PKB
-
ESPO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKB vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
PKB
ESPO
PKB vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKB | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.88 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | -0.54 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | -0.94 | +8.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKB vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKB | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -50.99% | -14.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.41% | -27.81% | +12.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.75% | -27.81% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | -48.33% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -27.19% | +22.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.75% | -15.06% | -0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 15.95% | -11.09% |
Volatility
PKB vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.42%. This indicates that PKB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKB | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.73% | 4.42% | +4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.69% | 14.67% | +4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.78% | 18.83% | +4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.78% | 25.10% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 25.71% | +1.58% |
PKB vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
PKB vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than ESPO's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.47% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKB and ESPO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PKB has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to ESPO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, PKB leads with 16.59% vs 5.49% for ESPO. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PKB has performed better with a 16.59% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.
PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.55% for ESPO.
PKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKB and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer