PJBF vs. ATMP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) and ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - PJBF is a Global Equities fund actively managed by PGIM, while ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. PJBF is actively managed, while ATMP is passively managed. PJBF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ATMP.

Performance

PJBF vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PJBF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ATMP

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 6.25%
• 6M: 22.03%
• YTD: 25.34%
• 1Y: 25.46%
• 3Y*: 21.54%
• 5Y*: 18.48%
• 10Y*: 4.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJBF vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	0.82%

Return for Risk

PJBF vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJBF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ATMP

ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 65
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJBF vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PJBF	ATMP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.75	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.47	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.10	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.25	—

Drawdowns

PJBF vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJBF drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJBF and ATMP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PJBF	ATMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-80.86%	+80.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.48%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.90%	+1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-30.91%	+30.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PJBF	ATMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.20%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	14.66%	-14.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	22.10%	-22.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	27.63%	-27.63%

PJBF vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJBF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PJBF vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison

Neither PJBF nor ATMP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PJBF or ATMP?

On fees, PJBF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PJBF or ATMP?

PJBF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PJBF or ATMP?

PJBF and ATMP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PJBF and ATMP?

PJBF is categorized as Global Equities, while ATMP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PJBF and 0.95% for ATMP.