PIPR vs. GMED
PIPR (Piper Sandler Companies) and GMED (Globus Medical, Inc.) are both stocks. PIPR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while GMED operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, PIPR returned 24.78%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for GMED. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PIPR vs. GMED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIPR achieves a -13.26% return, which is significantly lower than GMED's -10.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PIPR has outperformed GMED with an annualized return of 24.78%, while GMED has yielded a comparatively lower 12.07% annualized return.
PIPR
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -7.47%
- 6M
- -18.42%
- YTD
- -13.26%
- 1Y
- -2.12%
- 3Y*
- 31.32%
- 5Y*
- 21.93%
- 10Y*
- 24.78%
GMED
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -17.32%
- YTD
- -10.54%
- 1Y
- 36.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
PIPR vs. GMED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | -13.26% | 15.52% | 74.24% | 37.78% | -23.41% | 85.33% | 29.64% | 23.88% | -20.69% | 21.22% |
GMED Globus Medical, Inc. | -10.54% | 5.56% | 55.21% | -28.25% | 2.87% | 10.70% | 10.77% | 36.04% | 5.30% | 65.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPR and GMED is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
PIPR:
$4.87B
GMED:
$10.53B
PIPR:
$3.95
GMED:
$4.28
PIPR:
18.24
GMED:
18.23
PIPR:
1.21
GMED:
0.19
PIPR:
2.57
GMED:
3.45
PIPR:
3.83
GMED:
2.28
PIPR:
$2.00B
GMED:
$3.10B
PIPR:
$1.95B
GMED:
$1.58B
PIPR:
$455.82M
GMED:
$803.34M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIPR vs. GMED — Risk / Return Rank
PIPR
GMED
PIPR vs. GMED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) and Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIPR | GMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.21 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 1.60 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | 3.87 | -4.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIPR vs. GMED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPR drawdown since its inception was -76.97%, which is greater than GMED's maximum drawdown of -47.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPR and GMED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIPR | GMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.97% | -47.91% | -29.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.56% | -22.10% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.78% | -44.40% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.30% | -47.91% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.02% | -47.91% | -15.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.06% | -19.32% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.56% | -15.33% | -15.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.45% | 9.13% | +2.32% |
Volatility
PIPR vs. GMED - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) is 11.17%, while Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) has a volatility of 13.69%. This indicates that PIPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIPR | GMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.17% | 13.69% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.76% | 25.33% | +2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.06% | 49.46% | -14.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.41% | 38.27% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.54% | 35.68% | +0.86% |
Dividends
PIPR vs. GMED - Dividend Comparison
PIPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, while GMED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMED Globus Medical, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | 2.74% | 1.68% | 1.17% | 2.09% | 5.30% | 3.81% | 1.98% | 1.88% | 4.74% | 1.45% |
Financials
PIPR vs. GMED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Piper Sandler Companies and Globus Medical, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PIPR vs. GMED - Profitability Comparison
PIPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Piper Sandler Companies reported a gross profit of 456.39M and revenue of 475.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.
GMED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 759.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PIPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Piper Sandler Companies reported an operating income of 88.67M and revenue of 475.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.
GMED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported an operating income of 150.39M and revenue of 759.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.
PIPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Piper Sandler Companies reported a net income of 65.24M and revenue of 475.15M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.
GMED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a net income of 124.30M and revenue of 759.85M, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PIPR and GMED have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMED has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to PIPR (11.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPR dropped -76.97% vs GMED's -47.91%.
GMED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIPR and GMED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer