PIPR vs. PWP
Compare and contrast key facts about Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PIPR or PWP.
Key characteristics
| PIPR | PWP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 55.18% | 53.18% |
| 1Y Return | 78.64% | 73.90% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 30.47% | 12.91% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.99 | 2.28 |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.16% | 35.61% |
| Max Drawdown | -76.97% | -60.44% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.26% | -9.37% |
Fundamentals
| PIPR | PWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.24B | $1.59B |
| EPS | $7.63 | -$2.73 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.44B | $725.81M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.11B | -$80.73M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $196.35M | -$228.08M |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPR and PWP is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PIPR vs. PWP - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PIPR having a 55.18% return and PWP slightly lower at 53.18%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PIPR vs. PWP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PIPR vs. PWP - Dividend Comparison
PIPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than PWP's 1.52% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | 1.29% | 2.08% | 5.28% | 3.81% | 1.98% | 3.14% | 4.74% | 1.45% |
PWP Perella Weinberg Partners | 1.52% | 2.29% | 2.86% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PIPR vs. PWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPR drawdown since its inception was -76.97%, which is greater than PWP's maximum drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPR and PWP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PIPR vs. PWP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) is 7.92%, while Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) has a volatility of 10.05%. This indicates that PIPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PIPR vs. PWP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Piper Sandler Companies and Perella Weinberg Partners. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities