PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PIPR vs. SF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PIPRSF
YTD Return95.64%70.93%
1Y Return140.94%98.50%
3Y Return (Ann)27.48%17.33%
5Y Return (Ann)39.59%25.96%
10Y Return (Ann)22.48%15.03%
Sharpe Ratio4.143.83
Sortino Ratio5.345.30
Omega Ratio1.701.69
Calmar Ratio7.774.12
Martin Ratio39.7033.54
Ulcer Index3.55%2.92%
Daily Std Dev34.09%25.55%
Max Drawdown-76.97%-78.40%
Current Drawdown-2.80%-0.96%

Fundamentals


PIPRSF
Market Cap$5.35B$12.03B
EPS$9.35$5.48
PE Ratio36.0921.23
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.52B$5.75B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.41B$4.68B
EBITDA (TTM)$235.16M$1.35B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between PIPR and SF is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PIPR vs. SF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PIPR achieves a 95.64% return, which is significantly higher than SF's 70.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PIPR has outperformed SF with an annualized return of 22.48%, while SF has yielded a comparatively lower 15.03% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
60.45%
40.96%
PIPR
SF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PIPR vs. SF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) and Stifel Financial Corp. (SF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIPR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PIPR, currently valued at 4.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PIPR, currently valued at 5.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PIPR, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.70
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PIPR, currently valued at 7.77, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.007.77
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PIPR, currently valued at 39.70, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0039.70
SF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SF, currently valued at 3.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SF, currently valued at 5.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SF, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.69
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SF, currently valued at 4.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SF, currently valued at 33.54, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0033.54

PIPR vs. SF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.14, which is comparable to the SF Sharpe Ratio of 3.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIPR and SF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.14
3.83
PIPR
SF

Dividends

PIPR vs. SF - Dividend Comparison

PIPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SF's 1.39% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
PIPR
Piper Sandler Companies
1.02%2.09%5.30%3.81%1.98%3.14%4.74%1.45%
SF
Stifel Financial Corp.
1.39%2.08%2.06%0.85%0.90%0.99%1.16%0.34%

Drawdowns

PIPR vs. SF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIPR drawdown since its inception was -76.97%, roughly equal to the maximum SF drawdown of -78.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPR and SF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.80%
-0.96%
PIPR
SF

Volatility

PIPR vs. SF - Volatility Comparison

Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) has a higher volatility of 19.64% compared to Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) at 14.24%. This indicates that PIPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
19.64%
14.24%
PIPR
SF

Financials

PIPR vs. SF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Piper Sandler Companies and Stifel Financial Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items