PIEL vs. IFLO

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PIEL (Pacer International Export Leaders ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIEL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.

Performance

PIEL vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIEL achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 19.10% return.

PIEL

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -0.18%
• 6M: 9.81%
• YTD: 14.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IFLO

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: 16.45%
• YTD: 19.10%
• 1Y: 32.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIEL vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF	14.89%	-0.43%
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	19.10%	-0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PIEL and IFLO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025	0.78

Return for Risk

PIEL vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIEL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IFLO

IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 88
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIEL vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PIEL	IFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.17	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.15	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.66	—

Drawdowns

PIEL vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIEL drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIEL and IFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIEL	IFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.67%	-6.44%	-8.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.89%	-1.58%	-2.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	-1.28%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.91%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PIEL	IFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.81%	14.67%	+10.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.81%	14.62%	+10.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.81%	14.62%	+10.19%

PIEL vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIEL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIEL vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

PIEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.

Position	TTM	2025
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	1.56%	0.73%
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIEL and IFLO in my portfolio?

PIEL and IFLO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PIEL or IFLO?

On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PIEL or IFLO?

IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PIEL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PIEL or IFLO?

IFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for PIEL.

What is the main difference between PIEL and IFLO?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PIEL and 0.56% for IFLO.