PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFLO vs. HOLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFLO vs. HOLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLO achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly higher than HOLA's 4.32% return.


IFLO

1D
0.80%
1M
5.37%
YTD
20.27%
6M
21.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOLA

1D
0.40%
1M
1.12%
YTD
4.32%
6M
6.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLO vs. HOLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IFLO and HOLA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.77

IFLO vs. HOLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFLO
HOLA

Industrials

18.9%
15.5%

Technology

18.1%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
6.2%

Energy

13.6%
2.6%

Healthcare

12.6%
9.5%

Basic Materials

11.6%
5.2%

Communication Services

6.2%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
6.5%

Utilities

1.2%
2.7%

Financial Services

0.9%
23.9%

Real Estate

0.0%
1.0%

Industrials

IFLO
18.9%
HOLA
15.5%

Technology

IFLO
18.1%
HOLA
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IFLO
14.0%
HOLA
6.2%

Energy

IFLO
13.6%
HOLA
2.6%

Healthcare

IFLO
12.6%
HOLA
9.5%

Basic Materials

IFLO
11.6%
HOLA
5.2%

Communication Services

IFLO
6.2%
HOLA
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

IFLO
2.9%
HOLA
6.5%

Utilities

IFLO
1.2%
HOLA
2.7%

Financial Services

IFLO
0.9%
HOLA
23.9%

Real Estate

IFLO
0.0%
HOLA
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFLO vs. HOLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IFLO vs. HOLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFLOHOLADifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.74

1.45

+1.29

Drawdowns

IFLO vs. HOLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLO drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum HOLA drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLO and HOLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFLOHOLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-6.99%

+0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.52%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.21%

-1.45%

+0.24%

Volatility

IFLO vs. HOLA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFLOHOLADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

9.49%

+4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

9.49%

+4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.15%

9.49%

+4.66%

IFLO vs. HOLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than HOLA's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFLO vs. HOLA - Dividend Comparison

IFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than HOLA's 2.90% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IFLO and HOLA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.02% for IFLO.

IFLO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HOLA is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IFLO and 0.50% for HOLA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFLO and HOLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer