IFLO vs. HOLA
IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) and HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFLO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by VictoryShares, while HOLA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by JPMorgan. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFLO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HOLA.
Performance
IFLO vs. HOLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLO achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly higher than HOLA's 4.32% return.
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 20.27%
- 6M
- 21.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOLA
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO vs. HOLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 20.27% | 10.66% |
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 4.32% | 7.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLO and HOLA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.77 |
IFLO vs. HOLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFLO
HOLA
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
IFLO
HOLA
Technology
IFLO
HOLA
Consumer Cyclical
IFLO
HOLA
Energy
IFLO
HOLA
Healthcare
IFLO
HOLA
Basic Materials
IFLO
HOLA
Communication Services
IFLO
HOLA
Consumer Defensive
IFLO
HOLA
Utilities
IFLO
HOLA
Financial Services
IFLO
HOLA
Real Estate
IFLO
HOLA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLO vs. HOLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFLO | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.74 | 1.45 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
IFLO vs. HOLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLO drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum HOLA drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLO and HOLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLO | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -6.99% | +0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.52% | +1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.21% | -1.45% | +0.24% |
Volatility
IFLO vs. HOLA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLO | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.15% | 9.49% | +4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 9.49% | +4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 9.49% | +4.66% |
IFLO vs. HOLA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than HOLA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLO vs. HOLA - Dividend Comparison
IFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than HOLA's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.90% | 3.02% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.02% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLO and HOLA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.
HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.02% for IFLO.
IFLO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HOLA is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IFLO and 0.50% for HOLA.
Find the right allocation for IFLO and HOLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer