PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIE vs. XMVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIE vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 35.77% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 16.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PIE has underperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 9.44%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.11% annualized return.


PIE

1D
-1.78%
1M
-1.62%
6M
25.24%
YTD
35.77%
1Y
55.20%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
5.53%
10Y*
9.44%

XMVM

1D
1.85%
1M
4.62%
6M
12.27%
YTD
16.49%
1Y
33.46%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIE vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
35.77%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
16.49%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PIE and XMVM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between PIE and XMVM has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PIE vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIE
XMVM

Technology

51.1%
4.0%

Industrials

15.3%
8.8%

Financial Services

14.1%
41.9%

Energy

4.6%
8.0%

Healthcare

4.3%
0.7%

Real Estate

3.5%
4.2%

Basic Materials

2.9%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
15.0%

Communication Services

1.3%
0.9%

Utilities

1.1%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
7.1%

Technology

PIE
51.1%
XMVM
4.0%

Industrials

PIE
15.3%
XMVM
8.8%

Financial Services

PIE
14.1%
XMVM
41.9%

Energy

PIE
4.6%
XMVM
8.0%

Healthcare

PIE
4.3%
XMVM
0.7%

Real Estate

PIE
3.5%
XMVM
4.2%

Basic Materials

PIE
2.9%
XMVM
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PIE
1.4%
XMVM
15.0%

Communication Services

PIE
1.3%
XMVM
0.9%

Utilities

PIE
1.1%
XMVM
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

PIE
0.3%
XMVM
7.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIE vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIE vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIEXMVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.62

3.66

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.97

11.45

+4.52

PIE vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIE Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIE and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIE vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than XMVM's maximum drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and XMVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIEXMVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.98%

-62.83%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.87%

-9.18%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-24.12%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.06%

-24.12%

-15.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

-45.07%

+4.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

0.00%

-7.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.94%

-10.22%

-15.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.93%

+0.54%

Volatility

PIE vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a higher volatility of 10.94% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.35%. This indicates that PIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIEXMVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.94%

3.35%

+7.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.19%

9.57%

+12.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.28%

14.83%

+10.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

21.34%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

22.73%

-1.08%

PIE vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIE vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than XMVM's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.78%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.80%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIE and XMVM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (10.94%) compared to XMVM (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

On 10-year performance, XMVM leads with 12.11% vs 9.44% for PIE. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMVM has performed better with a 12.11% return vs 9.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.78% for PIE.

PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIE and XMVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer