PIE vs. XMVM
PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PIE tracks the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index while XMVM tracks the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PIE returned 9.44%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for XMVM. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XMVM.
Performance
PIE vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 35.77% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 16.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PIE has underperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 9.44%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.11% annualized return.
PIE
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- 6M
- 25.24%
- YTD
- 35.77%
- 1Y
- 55.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
XMVM
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- YTD
- 16.49%
- 1Y
- 33.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
PIE vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 35.77% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 26.11% | -22.04% | 41.80% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 16.49% | 18.46% | 11.73% | 16.31% | -8.21% | 35.15% | 5.68% | 30.38% | -9.62% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIE and XMVM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PIE and XMVM has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PIE vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PIE
XMVM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Technology
PIE
XMVM
Industrials
PIE
XMVM
Financial Services
PIE
XMVM
Energy
PIE
XMVM
Healthcare
PIE
XMVM
Real Estate
PIE
XMVM
Basic Materials
PIE
XMVM
Consumer Cyclical
PIE
XMVM
Communication Services
PIE
XMVM
Utilities
PIE
XMVM
Consumer Defensive
PIE
XMVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIE vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank
PIE
XMVM
PIE vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIE | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.41 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.62 | 3.66 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.97 | 11.45 | +4.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIE vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than XMVM's maximum drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and XMVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIE | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.98% | -62.83% | -10.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -9.18% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.69% | -24.12% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.06% | -24.12% | -15.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.32% | -45.07% | +4.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.11% | 0.00% | -7.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.94% | -10.22% | -15.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 2.93% | +0.54% |
Volatility
PIE vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a higher volatility of 10.94% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.35%. This indicates that PIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIE | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.94% | 3.35% | +7.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.19% | 9.57% | +12.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.28% | 14.83% | +10.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 21.34% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 22.73% | -1.08% |
PIE vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIE vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison
PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than XMVM's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.78% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.80% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIE and XMVM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIE has higher volatility (10.94%) compared to XMVM (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs XMVM's -62.83%.
On 10-year performance, XMVM leads with 12.11% vs 9.44% for PIE. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMVM has performed better with a 12.11% return vs 9.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.78% for PIE.
PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.39% for XMVM.
XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIE and XMVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer