PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIE vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIE vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 39.11% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PIE has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 10.15%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.


PIE

1D
-0.95%
1M
5.39%
YTD
39.11%
6M
38.18%
1Y
70.48%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
10.15%

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIE vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
39.11%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PIE and XMMO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2007

0.62

The correlation between PIE and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PIE vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIE
XMMO

Technology

47.0%
16.7%

Industrials

16.8%
41.1%

Financial Services

14.4%
2.4%

Energy

5.4%
7.7%

Healthcare

5.1%
6.3%

Real Estate

3.6%
6.1%

Basic Materials

3.2%
7.2%

Communication Services

1.4%
1.6%

Utilities

1.3%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
0.5%

Technology

PIE
47.0%
XMMO
16.7%

Industrials

PIE
16.8%
XMMO
41.1%

Financial Services

PIE
14.4%
XMMO
2.4%

Energy

PIE
5.4%
XMMO
7.7%

Healthcare

PIE
5.1%
XMMO
6.3%

Real Estate

PIE
3.6%
XMMO
6.1%

Basic Materials

PIE
3.2%
XMMO
7.2%

Communication Services

PIE
1.4%
XMMO
1.6%

Utilities

PIE
1.3%
XMMO
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PIE
1.3%
XMMO
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

PIE
0.4%
XMMO
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIE vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIE vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIEXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.35

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.18

4.45

+2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.52

18.21

+5.31

PIE vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIE Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIE and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIEXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

1.99

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.78

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.89

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.58

-0.46

Drawdowns

PIE vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIEXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.98%

-55.37%

-17.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.87%

-8.34%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-24.93%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.32%

-27.91%

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

-36.74%

-3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

0.00%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.08%

-9.45%

-16.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.04%

+0.97%

Volatility

PIE vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 7.82%. This indicates that PIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIEXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

7.82%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.77%

15.54%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.91%

18.71%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.23%

21.45%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.35%

22.27%

-0.92%

PIE vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIE vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.70%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIE and XMMO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to XMMO (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 10.15% for PIE. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 10.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.35% for XMMO.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIE and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer