PIE vs. MMTM
PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) are both Momentum funds - PIE tracks the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index while MMTM tracks the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PIE returned 10.15%/yr vs 15.00%/yr for MMTM. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for MMTM.
Performance
PIE vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 39.11% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PIE has underperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 10.15%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.
PIE
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 39.11%
- 6M
- 38.18%
- 1Y
- 70.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
MMTM
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
PIE vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 39.11% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 26.11% | -22.04% | 41.80% |
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 9.16% | 13.26% | 29.94% | 22.49% | -16.12% | 26.33% | 19.27% | 29.98% | -4.62% | 24.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIE and MMTM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2012 | 0.50 |
The correlation between PIE and MMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
PIE vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PIE
MMTM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
PIE
MMTM
Industrials
PIE
MMTM
Financial Services
PIE
MMTM
Energy
PIE
MMTM
Healthcare
PIE
MMTM
Real Estate
PIE
MMTM
Basic Materials
PIE
MMTM
Communication Services
PIE
MMTM
Utilities
PIE
MMTM
Consumer Cyclical
PIE
MMTM
Consumer Defensive
PIE
MMTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIE vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank
PIE
MMTM
PIE vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIE | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.31 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.18 | 2.46 | +4.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.52 | 11.15 | +12.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIE | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | 1.72 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.75 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.81 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.85 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
PIE vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and MMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIE | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.98% | -33.85% | -39.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -9.89% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.69% | -22.08% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.32% | -23.72% | -16.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.32% | -33.85% | -6.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -1.48% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -4.20% | -21.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.18% | +0.83% |
Volatility
PIE vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 2.35%. This indicates that PIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIE | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 2.35% | +6.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.77% | 10.73% | +7.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.91% | 14.19% | +7.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 18.20% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 18.65% | +2.70% |
PIE vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIE vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison
PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than MMTM's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 0.78% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.70% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIE and MMTM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIE has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to MMTM (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs MMTM's -33.85%.
On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 15.00% vs 10.15% for PIE. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 15.00% return vs 10.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.78% for MMTM.
PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.12% for MMTM.
PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIE and MMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer