PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MMTM vs. VLU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MMTM and VLU is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

MMTM vs. VLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.55%
7.92%
MMTM
VLU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MMTM:

2.02

VLU:

2.05

Sortino Ratio

MMTM:

2.75

VLU:

2.82

Omega Ratio

MMTM:

1.36

VLU:

1.38

Calmar Ratio

MMTM:

3.03

VLU:

3.75

Martin Ratio

MMTM:

12.23

VLU:

10.34

Ulcer Index

MMTM:

2.72%

VLU:

2.26%

Daily Std Dev

MMTM:

16.46%

VLU:

11.38%

Max Drawdown

MMTM:

-33.85%

VLU:

-37.38%

Current Drawdown

MMTM:

-1.92%

VLU:

-2.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than VLU's 3.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MMTM has outperformed VLU with an annualized return of 15.49%, while VLU has yielded a comparatively lower 14.43% annualized return.


MMTM

YTD

2.67%

1M

2.01%

6M

9.55%

1Y

29.63%

5Y*

14.88%

10Y*

15.49%

VLU

YTD

3.14%

1M

2.97%

6M

7.92%

1Y

21.44%

5Y*

13.09%

10Y*

14.43%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MMTM vs. VLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MMTM and VLU have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
Expense ratio chart for MMTM: current value at 0.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.12%
Expense ratio chart for VLU: current value at 0.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.12%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MMTM vs. VLU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMTM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MMTM is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MMTM is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MMTM is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MMTM is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MMTM is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MMTM is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VLU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VLU is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VLU is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VLU is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VLU is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VLU is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VLU is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MMTM vs. VLU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MMTM, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.022.05
The chart of Sortino ratio for MMTM, currently valued at 2.75, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.752.82
The chart of Omega ratio for MMTM, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.361.38
The chart of Calmar ratio for MMTM, currently valued at 3.03, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.033.75
The chart of Martin ratio for MMTM, currently valued at 12.23, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.2310.34
MMTM
VLU

The current MMTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the VLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMTM and VLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.02
2.05
MMTM
VLU

Dividends

MMTM vs. VLU - Dividend Comparison

MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than VLU's 1.94% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.81%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.63%1.52%1.98%1.68%1.54%
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
1.94%2.00%2.02%2.16%1.86%1.98%2.19%2.57%1.95%2.14%6.37%5.42%

Drawdowns

MMTM vs. VLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, smaller than the maximum VLU drawdown of -37.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and VLU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.92%
-2.47%
MMTM
VLU

Volatility

MMTM vs. VLU - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) at 4.38%. This indicates that MMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.76%
4.38%
MMTM
VLU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab