MMTM vs. MTUM
MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - MMTM tracks the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index while MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MMTM returned 15.09%/yr vs 18.03%/yr for MTUM. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMTM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
MMTM vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 38.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MMTM has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 15.09%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.03% annualized return.
MMTM
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 23.38%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 13.83%
- YTD
- 38.19%
- 6M
- 36.52%
- 1Y
- 50.96%
- 3Y*
- 35.93%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
MMTM vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 7.75% | 13.26% | 29.94% | 22.49% | -16.12% | 26.33% | 19.27% | 29.98% | -4.62% | 24.41% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 38.19% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMTM and MTUM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.77 |
The correlation between MMTM and MTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MMTM vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MMTM
MTUM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
MMTM
MTUM
Financial Services
MMTM
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
MMTM
MTUM
Healthcare
MMTM
MTUM
Communication Services
MMTM
MTUM
Industrials
MMTM
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
MMTM
MTUM
Real Estate
MMTM
MTUM
Utilities
MMTM
MTUM
Basic Materials
MMTM
MTUM
Energy
MMTM
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMTM vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
MMTM
MTUM
MMTM vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMTM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.43 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 4.44 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.47 | 17.05 | -6.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMTM vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMTM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.85% | -34.08% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.89% | -11.54% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.08% | -20.99% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.72% | -32.28% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.85% | -34.08% | +0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | 0.00% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -6.19% | +2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 3.00% | -0.76% |
Volatility
MMTM vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) is 3.47%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that MMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMTM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 11.02% | -7.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 18.88% | -8.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.40% | 21.48% | -7.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 21.06% | -2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 21.28% | -2.60% |
MMTM vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MMTM vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than MTUM's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 1.08% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.54% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMTM and MTUM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to MMTM (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 18.03% vs 15.09% for MMTM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 18.03% return vs 15.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.
MMTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.54% for MTUM.
MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MMTM and 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMTM and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer