PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMTM vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMTM vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 38.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MMTM has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 15.09%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.03% annualized return.


MMTM

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
7.75%
6M
7.09%
1Y
23.38%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
15.09%

MTUM

1D
1.98%
1M
13.83%
YTD
38.19%
6M
36.52%
1Y
50.96%
3Y*
35.93%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
18.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMTM vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
7.75%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%24.41%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
38.19%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MMTM and MTUM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.77

The correlation between MMTM and MTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MMTM vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MMTM
MTUM

Technology

32.3%
50.2%

Financial Services

15.1%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
2.9%

Healthcare

10.7%
3.5%

Communication Services

7.4%
5.1%

Industrials

7.3%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
3.7%

Real Estate

3.0%
1.3%

Utilities

2.4%
0.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.3%

Energy

1.6%
10.5%

Technology

MMTM
32.3%
MTUM
50.2%

Financial Services

MMTM
15.1%
MTUM
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MMTM
12.1%
MTUM
2.9%

Healthcare

MMTM
10.7%
MTUM
3.5%

Communication Services

MMTM
7.4%
MTUM
5.1%

Industrials

MMTM
7.3%
MTUM
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

MMTM
6.2%
MTUM
3.7%

Real Estate

MMTM
3.0%
MTUM
1.3%

Utilities

MMTM
2.4%
MTUM
0.6%

Basic Materials

MMTM
1.9%
MTUM
2.3%

Energy

MMTM
1.6%
MTUM
10.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMTM vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMTM vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMTMMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

4.44

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.47

17.05

-6.58

MMTM vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMTM and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMTM vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMTMMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.85%

-34.08%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-11.54%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.08%

-20.99%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.72%

-32.28%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-34.08%

+0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

0.00%

-2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-6.19%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

3.00%

-0.76%

Volatility

MMTM vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) is 3.47%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that MMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMTMMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

11.02%

-7.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

18.88%

-8.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

21.48%

-7.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

21.06%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

21.28%

-2.60%

MMTM vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MMTM vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than MTUM's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
1.08%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.54%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMTM and MTUM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to MMTM (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 18.03% vs 15.09% for MMTM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 18.03% return vs 15.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

MMTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.54% for MTUM.

MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MMTM and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMTM and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer