PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYSX vs. BUFHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYSX vs. BUFHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) and Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYSX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than BUFHX's 1.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PHYSX having a 5.34% annualized return and BUFHX not far ahead at 5.36%.


PHYSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.61%
6M
1.04%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
5.34%

BUFHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.80%
6M
2.36%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
4.90%
10Y*
5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYSX vs. BUFHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHYSX
PIA High Yield Fund
0.61%1.82%10.33%16.17%-11.70%7.36%8.03%11.06%-2.77%8.04%
BUFHX
Buffalo High Yield Fund
1.80%5.11%10.35%11.68%-5.53%5.52%9.26%12.33%-2.26%5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYSX and BUFHX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 1999

0.40

Over the past year, PHYSX and BUFHX have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYSX vs. BUFHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYSX
PHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFHX
BUFHX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BUFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYSX vs. BUFHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) and Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYSXBUFHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.44

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

2.40

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.89

10.15

-7.26

PHYSX vs. BUFHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the BUFHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYSX and BUFHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYSXBUFHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.06

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

1.56

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.31

1.33

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

1.52

+0.11

Drawdowns

PHYSX vs. BUFHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYSX drawdown since its inception was -24.10%, smaller than the maximum BUFHX drawdown of -26.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYSX and BUFHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYSXBUFHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.10%

-26.01%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.82%

-2.13%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-3.83%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.99%

-9.98%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.86%

-18.74%

-1.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

0.00%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-2.03%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

0.50%

+0.79%

Volatility

PHYSX vs. BUFHX - Volatility Comparison

PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) at 0.69%. This indicates that PHYSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYSXBUFHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.69%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

1.96%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23%

2.49%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.06%

3.14%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.10%

4.04%

+0.06%

PHYSX vs. BUFHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFHX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYSX vs. BUFHX - Dividend Comparison

PHYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than BUFHX's 6.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFHX
Buffalo High Yield Fund
6.94%6.84%8.03%6.41%8.05%7.24%4.11%4.21%5.17%4.57%3.85%5.51%
PHYSX
PIA High Yield Fund
7.41%8.44%7.66%7.12%7.60%6.14%6.31%6.76%6.51%6.37%6.10%6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYSX and BUFHX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHYSX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to BUFHX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYSX dropped -24.10% vs BUFHX's -26.01%.

BUFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYSX and BUFHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer