PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYSX vs. RGHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYSX vs. RGHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) and RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYSX achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than RGHYX's 1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYSX has underperformed RGHYX with an annualized return of 5.41%, while RGHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.17% annualized return.


PHYSX

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.03%
YTD
1.22%
6M
1.53%
1Y
2.80%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
5.41%

RGHYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.97%
1Y
6.87%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
6.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYSX vs. RGHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHYSX
PIA High Yield Fund
1.22%1.82%10.33%16.17%-11.70%7.36%8.03%11.06%-2.77%8.04%
RGHYX
RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund
1.67%9.02%7.14%12.88%-8.48%3.72%9.65%15.83%-0.73%6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYSX and RGHYX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.71

The correlation between PHYSX and RGHYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYSX vs. RGHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYSX
PHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

RGHYX
RGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYSX vs. RGHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) and RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHYSXRGHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.59

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

2.65

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.35

12.27

-9.92

PHYSX vs. RGHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the RGHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYSX and RGHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHYSX vs. RGHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYSX drawdown since its inception was -24.10%, which is greater than RGHYX's maximum drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYSX and RGHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYSXRGHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.10%

-17.38%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.82%

-2.65%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-4.01%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.99%

-12.79%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.86%

-17.38%

-2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.10%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-1.47%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.57%

+0.73%

Volatility

PHYSX vs. RGHYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) is 0.65%, while RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) has a volatility of 0.69%. This indicates that PHYSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYSXRGHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.69%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.56%

2.14%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23%

2.65%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.06%

4.39%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.09%

4.67%

-0.58%

PHYSX vs. RGHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than RGHYX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYSX vs. RGHYX - Dividend Comparison

PHYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than RGHYX's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHYSX
PIA High Yield Fund
7.36%8.44%7.66%7.12%7.60%6.14%6.31%6.76%6.51%6.37%6.10%6.40%
RGHYX
RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund
6.37%6.68%6.91%6.22%6.04%5.29%5.54%4.88%6.79%3.88%4.44%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYSX and RGHYX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGHYX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to PHYSX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYSX dropped -24.10% vs RGHYX's -17.38%.

RGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYSX and RGHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer