PHYSX vs. PCEF
Compare and contrast key facts about PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) and Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF).
PHYSX is managed by PIA Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 31, 2010. PCEF is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index. It was launched on Feb 19, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PHYSX or PCEF.
Correlation
The correlation between PHYSX and PCEF is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PHYSX vs. PCEF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PHYSX:
0.85
PCEF:
1.00
PHYSX:
1.08
PCEF:
1.36
PHYSX:
1.19
PCEF:
1.24
PHYSX:
0.56
PCEF:
0.96
PHYSX:
2.35
PCEF:
4.63
PHYSX:
1.46%
PCEF:
2.90%
PHYSX:
4.04%
PCEF:
13.48%
PHYSX:
-19.86%
PCEF:
-38.64%
PHYSX:
-4.42%
PCEF:
-4.03%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHYSX achieves a -3.73% return, which is significantly lower than PCEF's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYSX has underperformed PCEF with an annualized return of 4.91%, while PCEF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.77% annualized return.
PHYSX
-3.73%
-2.29%
-2.34%
3.21%
8.15%
4.91%
PCEF
0.32%
-0.52%
1.01%
12.08%
8.92%
5.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PHYSX vs. PCEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHYSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than PCEF's 2.34% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PHYSX vs. PCEF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PHYSX
PCEF
PHYSX vs. PCEF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) and Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PHYSX vs. PCEF - Dividend Comparison
PHYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, less than PCEF's 8.85% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYSX PIA High Yield Fund | 7.45% | 7.68% | 7.40% | 8.23% | 6.13% | 6.30% | 6.61% | 6.52% | 6.39% | 6.10% | 6.41% | 5.82% |
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 8.85% | 8.79% | 9.86% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 7.54% | 7.12% | 8.21% | 6.96% | 7.72% | 9.18% | 8.02% |
Drawdowns
PHYSX vs. PCEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHYSX drawdown since its inception was -19.86%, smaller than the maximum PCEF drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYSX and PCEF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PHYSX vs. PCEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) is 3.03%, while Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) has a volatility of 11.20%. This indicates that PHYSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with PHYSX or PCEF
Recent discussions
Filtering portfolio screening columns
Bee Zee
Going forward performance roughly coinciding with historically optimized portfolios on this site?
I'm quite new to the site, but I am concerned that a portfolio optimized with past data may have no bearing at all on its future performance. Has anyone been around long enough to speak to this concern. Have you outperformed a relevant benchmark with actual invested money?
Also, if you've been here awhile, what tools on the site do you find most useful?
Thanks for reading!
Bob Peticolas
Does Portfolio Performance Consider Historical Composition?
When I see the past performance of a particular portfolio, does it mean the performance of the current composition, or do I get the performance by weighting the portfolio against all its old compositions?
It is very important to learn about the success of the portfolio.
MOTTY