PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYSX vs. MFHVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) and Mesirow High Yield Fund (MFHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYSX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than MFHVX's 2.95% return.


PHYSX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.43%
YTD
0.61%
6M
1.16%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
5.34%

MFHVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.95%
6M
3.00%
1Y
7.33%
3Y*
8.71%
5Y*
4.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PHYSX
PIA High Yield Fund
0.61%1.82%10.33%16.17%-11.70%7.36%8.03%11.06%-2.34%
MFHVX
Mesirow High Yield Fund
2.95%4.56%9.72%14.09%-12.06%10.53%6.88%12.81%-3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYSX and MFHVX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2018

0.76

The correlation between PHYSX and MFHVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYSX vs. MFHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYSX
PHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MFHVX
MFHVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MFHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MFHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) and Mesirow High Yield Fund (MFHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYSXMFHVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

2.73

-1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

3.94

-2.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.57

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

3.26

-2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.07

8.29

-5.22

PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the MFHVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYSX and MFHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYSXMFHVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.73

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

1.23

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

1.33

+0.30

Drawdowns

PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYSX drawdown since its inception was -24.10%, which is greater than MFHVX's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYSX and MFHVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYSXMFHVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.10%

-20.95%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.82%

-2.43%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-5.14%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.99%

-13.54%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

0.00%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-3.07%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

0.95%

+0.34%

Volatility

PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Volatility Comparison

PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to Mesirow High Yield Fund (MFHVX) at 0.71%. This indicates that PHYSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYSXMFHVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

0.71%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.57%

2.01%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

2.76%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.06%

3.46%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.10%

4.42%

-0.32%

PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than MFHVX's 1.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Dividend Comparison

PHYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, less than MFHVX's 9.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFHVX
Mesirow High Yield Fund
9.35%9.41%8.98%9.66%8.95%8.44%7.30%8.61%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHYSX
PIA High Yield Fund
7.41%8.44%7.66%7.12%7.60%6.14%6.31%6.76%6.51%6.37%6.10%6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYSX and MFHVX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHYSX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to MFHVX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYSX dropped -24.10% vs MFHVX's -20.95%.

MFHVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYSX and MFHVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer