PHYSX vs. MFHVX
PHYSX (PIA High Yield Fund) and MFHVX (Mesirow High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PHYSX returned 3.57%/yr vs 4.23%/yr for MFHVX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PHYSX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for MFHVX.
Performance
PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHYSX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than MFHVX's 2.95% return.
PHYSX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
MFHVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 3.00%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.23%
- 10Y*
- —
PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYSX PIA High Yield Fund | 0.61% | 1.82% | 10.33% | 16.17% | -11.70% | 7.36% | 8.03% | 11.06% | -2.34% |
MFHVX Mesirow High Yield Fund | 2.95% | 4.56% | 9.72% | 14.09% | -12.06% | 10.53% | 6.88% | 12.81% | -3.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHYSX and MFHVX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between PHYSX and MFHVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHYSX vs. MFHVX — Risk / Return Rank
PHYSX
MFHVX
PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) and Mesirow High Yield Fund (MFHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHYSX | MFHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 2.73 | -1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 3.94 | -2.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.57 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 3.26 | -2.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 8.29 | -5.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHYSX | MFHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.73 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 1.23 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 1.33 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHYSX drawdown since its inception was -24.10%, which is greater than MFHVX's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYSX and MFHVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHYSX | MFHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.10% | -20.95% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.82% | -2.43% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.11% | -5.14% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.99% | -13.54% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | 0.00% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -3.07% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 0.95% | +0.34% |
Volatility
PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Volatility Comparison
PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to Mesirow High Yield Fund (MFHVX) at 0.71%. This indicates that PHYSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHYSX | MFHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 0.71% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.57% | 2.01% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24% | 2.76% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 3.46% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.10% | 4.42% | -0.32% |
PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHYSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than MFHVX's 1.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHYSX vs. MFHVX - Dividend Comparison
PHYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, less than MFHVX's 9.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFHVX Mesirow High Yield Fund | 9.35% | 9.41% | 8.98% | 9.66% | 8.95% | 8.44% | 7.30% | 8.61% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHYSX PIA High Yield Fund | 7.41% | 8.44% | 7.66% | 7.12% | 7.60% | 6.14% | 6.31% | 6.76% | 6.51% | 6.37% | 6.10% | 6.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHYSX and MFHVX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHYSX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to MFHVX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYSX dropped -24.10% vs MFHVX's -20.95%.
MFHVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHYSX and MFHVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer