PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFHX vs. RGHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFHX vs. RGHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) and RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFHX achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly higher than RGHYX's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFHX has underperformed RGHYX with an annualized return of 5.20%, while RGHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.88% annualized return.


BUFHX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.25%
YTD
2.08%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
5.20%
ALL TIME*
6.51%

RGHYX

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.50%
6M
0.65%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
5.88%
ALL TIME*
6.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BUFHX vs. RGHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFHX
Buffalo High Yield Fund
2.08%5.11%10.35%11.68%-5.53%5.52%9.26%12.33%-2.26%5.98%
RGHYX
RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund
1.35%9.02%7.14%12.88%-8.48%3.72%9.65%15.83%-0.73%6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFHX and RGHYX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.66

The correlation between BUFHX and RGHYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFHX vs. RGHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUFHX
BUFHX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BUFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

RGHYX
RGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUFHX vs. RGHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) and RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUFHXRGHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.88

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.70

8.46

-1.76

BUFHX vs. RGHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the RGHYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFHX and RGHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFHX vs. RGHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFHX drawdown since its inception was -26.01%, which is greater than RGHYX's maximum drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFHX and RGHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFHXRGHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.01%

-17.38%

-8.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.13%

-2.65%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.83%

-4.01%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.98%

-12.79%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.74%

-17.38%

-1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.70%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-1.46%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

0.59%

-0.08%

Volatility

BUFHX vs. RGHYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) is 0.56%, while RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) has a volatility of 0.65%. This indicates that BUFHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFHXRGHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

0.65%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.00%

2.20%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52%

2.67%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.14%

4.39%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

4.65%

-0.63%

BUFHX vs. RGHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFHX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than RGHYX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFHX vs. RGHYX - Dividend Comparison

BUFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than RGHYX's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFHX
Buffalo High Yield Fund
7.07%6.84%8.03%6.41%8.05%7.24%4.11%4.21%5.17%4.57%3.85%5.51%
RGHYX
RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund
5.72%6.68%6.91%6.22%6.04%5.29%5.54%4.88%6.79%3.88%4.44%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFHX and RGHYX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGHYX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to BUFHX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFHX dropped -26.01% vs RGHYX's -17.38%.

RGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFHX and RGHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer