PortfoliosLab logo
PHYSX vs. EFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PHYSX and EFT is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PHYSX vs. EFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PHYSX:

1.31

EFT:

0.11

Sortino Ratio

PHYSX:

1.55

EFT:

0.25

Omega Ratio

PHYSX:

1.28

EFT:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

PHYSX:

0.81

EFT:

0.10

Martin Ratio

PHYSX:

3.01

EFT:

0.37

Ulcer Index

PHYSX:

1.64%

EFT:

4.55%

Daily Std Dev

PHYSX:

4.10%

EFT:

14.14%

Max Drawdown

PHYSX:

-19.86%

EFT:

-60.58%

Current Drawdown

PHYSX:

-1.94%

EFT:

-6.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYSX achieves a -1.23% return, which is significantly higher than EFT's -1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYSX has underperformed EFT with an annualized return of 5.13%, while EFT has yielded a comparatively higher 5.91% annualized return.


PHYSX

YTD

-1.23%

1M

1.88%

6M

-1.23%

1Y

5.24%

3Y*

7.00%

5Y*

7.45%

10Y*

5.13%

EFT

YTD

-1.44%

1M

2.10%

6M

-4.44%

1Y

0.98%

3Y*

10.31%

5Y*

10.64%

10Y*

5.91%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PIA High Yield Fund

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHYSX vs. EFT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHYSX is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHYSX is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHYSX is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHYSX is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHYSX is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHYSX is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

EFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFT is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFT is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFT is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFT is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFT is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFT is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PHYSX vs. EFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PHYSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the EFT Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYSX and EFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PHYSX vs. EFT - Dividend Comparison

PHYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, less than EFT's 10.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PHYSX
PIA High Yield Fund
8.01%7.65%7.42%8.23%6.14%6.31%6.76%6.51%6.37%6.10%6.40%6.32%
EFT
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust
10.22%10.52%11.09%9.14%5.26%5.40%7.41%6.77%5.26%5.54%7.17%5.82%

Drawdowns

PHYSX vs. EFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYSX drawdown since its inception was -19.86%, smaller than the maximum EFT drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYSX and EFT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PHYSX vs. EFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIA High Yield Fund (PHYSX) is 1.35%, while Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that PHYSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...