BUFHX vs. PDBZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX).
BUFHX is managed by Buffalo. It was launched on May 19, 1995. PDBZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 14, 1997.
Performance
BUFHX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BUFHX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFHX Buffalo High Yield Fund | -0.57% | 5.11% | 10.35% | 11.68% | -5.53% | 5.52% | 9.26% | 12.33% | -2.26% | 5.98% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | -0.53% | 7.70% | 2.87% | 7.70% | -14.33% | -1.46% | 8.01% | 14.76% | -0.72% | 6.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFHX achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than PDBZX's -0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFHX has outperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 5.35%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.93% annualized return.
BUFHX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 5.35%
PDBZX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUFHX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFHX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BUFHX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank
BUFHX
PDBZX
BUFHX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUFHX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 1.04 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 1.48 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.18 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.75 | -0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.08 | 5.12 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUFHX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.04 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.53 | 0.17 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.33 | 0.55 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 1.09 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFHX and PDBZX is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BUFHX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison
BUFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than PDBZX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFHX Buffalo High Yield Fund | 7.12% | 6.84% | 8.03% | 6.41% | 8.05% | 7.24% | 4.11% | 4.21% | 5.17% | 4.57% | 3.85% | 5.51% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | 4.19% | 4.54% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.73% | 2.73% | 2.94% | 10.36% | 4.01% | 2.87% | 3.92% | 3.33% |
Drawdowns
BUFHX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFHX drawdown since its inception was -26.01%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFHX and PDBZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFHX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.01% | -20.88% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.00% | -3.06% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.98% | -20.81% | +10.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.74% | -20.88% | +2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -2.52% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -2.31% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 1.05% | -0.33% |
Volatility
BUFHX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) is 1.27%, while PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that BUFHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BUFHX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 1.72% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.89% | 2.71% | -0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19% | 4.59% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.13% | 6.00% | -2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 5.34% | -1.30% |