PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYS vs. TBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYS vs. TBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYS achieves a -7.09% return, which is significantly lower than TBIL's 2.11% return.


PHYS

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.29%
6M
-12.34%
YTD
-7.09%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
26.68%
5Y*
16.38%
10Y*
10.70%
ALL TIME*
7.29%

TBIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.80%
YTD
2.11%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$100.21M$90.62M$105.67M
$85.10M$79.65M$91.28M

PHYS vs. TBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
-7.09%63.95%26.43%12.98%0.79%
TBIL
F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF
2.11%4.19%5.15%5.12%1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYS and TBIL is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYS vs. TBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PHYS
PHYS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TBIL
TBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PHYS vs. TBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHYSTBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-66.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

22.61

-21.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

192.87

-192.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.58

1,097.12

-1,095.54

PHYS vs. TBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYS Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the TBIL Sharpe Ratio of 14.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYS and TBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHYS vs. TBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYS drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than TBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS and TBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYSTBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.16%

-0.10%

-48.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.75%

-0.02%

-26.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.75%

-0.02%

-26.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.04%

0.00%

-25.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.02%

0.00%

-21.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.45%

0.00%

+12.45%

Volatility

PHYS vs. TBIL - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that PHYS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYSTBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

0.07%

+6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.44%

0.20%

+21.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.92%

0.28%

+28.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.82%

0.32%

+18.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.45%

0.32%

+16.13%

Dividends

PHYS vs. TBIL - Dividend Comparison

PHYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TBIL
F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF
3.69%4.07%5.02%5.00%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYS and TBIL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHYS has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to TBIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYS dropped -48.16% vs TBIL's -0.10%.

TBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.03 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYS and TBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer