PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBIL vs. BOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBIL vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TBIL having a 1.67% return and BOXX slightly higher at 1.72%.


TBIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
10Y*

BOXX

1D
0.02%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.87%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBIL vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TBIL
F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF
1.67%4.19%5.15%5.12%0.04%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
1.72%4.37%5.16%5.04%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TBIL and BOXX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2022

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBIL vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBIL
TBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBIL vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBILBOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+22.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

17.08

9.07

+8.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

195.79

58.74

+137.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

929.44

507.08

+422.37

TBIL vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBIL Sharpe Ratio is 13.76, which is comparable to the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 12.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBIL and BOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBIL vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum BOXX drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBIL and BOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBILBOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-0.12%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-0.07%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.02%

-0.12%

+0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.01%

-0.01%

Volatility

TBIL vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) is 0.06%, while Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) has a volatility of 0.12%. This indicates that TBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBILBOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

0.12%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.19%

0.26%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29%

0.32%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.32%

0.37%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.32%

0.37%

-0.05%

TBIL vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBIL vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

TBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, while BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%0.00%0.00%
TBIL
F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF
3.81%4.07%5.02%5.00%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBIL and BOXX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOXX has higher volatility (0.12%) compared to TBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBIL dropped -0.10% vs BOXX's -0.12%.

On 3-year performance, BOXX leads with 4.71% vs 4.59% for TBIL. On fees, TBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BOXX has performed better with a 4.71% return vs 4.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BOXX.

TBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.00% for BOXX.

TBIL tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3M Total Return USD Unhedged Index, while BOXX tracks Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TBIL and 0.19% for BOXX.

TBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.76 vs 12.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBIL and BOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer