PHYL vs. FNGU
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).
PHYL and FNGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PHYL is an actively managed fund by Prudential. It was launched on Sep 24, 2018. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PHYL or FNGU.
Key characteristics
| PHYL | FNGU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.48% | 47.69% |
| 1Y Return | 9.59% | 209.71% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.02% | 10.25% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.94% | 52.91% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.70 | 3.11 |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.63% | 69.75% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.06% | -92.34% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.60% | -29.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHYL and FNGU is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PHYL vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PHYL achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 47.69% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PHYL vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHYL has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PHYL vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PHYL vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
PHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF | 7.97% | 7.62% | 6.55% | 6.13% | 7.51% | 7.30% | 1.79% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PHYL vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHYL drawdown since its inception was -22.06%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYL and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PHYL vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) is 1.17%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 21.43%. This indicates that PHYL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.