PHYL vs. FNGR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PHYL (PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Prudential, while FNGR (FingerMotion Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PHYL returned 4.00%/yr vs -43.59%/yr for FNGR. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PHYL vs. FNGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and FingerMotion Inc (FNGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYL achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than FNGR's -63.39% return.

PHYL

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.62%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: 6.79%
• 3Y*: 9.30%
• 5Y*: 4.00%
• 10Y*: —

FNGR

• 1D: -4.92%
• 1M: -42.55%
• YTD: -63.39%
• 6M: -68.94%
• 1Y: -77.37%
• 3Y*: -49.18%
• 5Y*: -43.59%
• 10Y*: -0.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYL vs. FNGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF	1.62%	9.65%	8.45%	11.91%	-11.80%	6.20%	6.31%	16.77%	-4.17%
FNGR FingerMotion Inc	-63.39%	2.50%	-70.15%	43.06%	-60.48%	-29.36%	1,084.12%	-70.69%	-12.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYL and FNGR is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018	0.11

Return for Risk

PHYL vs. FNGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYL

PHYL Risk / Return Rank: 65
PHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
PHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 72
PHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FNGR

FNGR Risk / Return Rank: 5
FNGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FNGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FNGR Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FNGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FNGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYL vs. FNGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and FingerMotion Inc (FNGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PHYL	FNGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	-0.79	+2.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	-1.60	+4.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	0.83	+0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	-0.97	+3.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.57	-1.89	+13.46

PHYL vs. FNGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYL Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the FNGR Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYL and FNGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PHYL vs. FNGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYL drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum FNGR drawdown of -97.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYL and FNGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHYL	FNGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.07%	-97.86%	+75.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.68%	-79.72%	+77.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.53%	-94.51%	+89.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.11%	-95.20%	+79.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-97.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-97.19%	+96.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.05%	-63.19%	+60.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.59%	40.88%	-40.29%

Volatility

PHYL vs. FNGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) is 1.06%, while FingerMotion Inc (FNGR) has a volatility of 43.75%. This indicates that PHYL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHYL	FNGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	43.75%	-42.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.73%	73.32%	-70.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.35%	98.93%	-95.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.70%	129.19%	-123.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.64%	186.34%	-178.70%

Dividends

PHYL vs. FNGR - Dividend Comparison

PHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, while FNGR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FNGR FingerMotion Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF	6.99%	7.05%	8.28%	7.62%	6.55%	6.13%	7.51%	7.31%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHYL and FNGR in my portfolio?

PHYL and FNGR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PHYL or FNGR?

FNGR has higher volatility (43.75%) compared to PHYL (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYL dropped -22.07% vs FNGR's -97.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PHYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.