PortfoliosLab logo
PHYL vs. FNGR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PHYL and FNGR is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

PHYL vs. FNGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and FingerMotion Inc (FNGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
37.67%
-43.64%
PHYL
FNGR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PHYL:

2.07

FNGR:

-0.44

Sortino Ratio

PHYL:

2.88

FNGR:

-0.07

Omega Ratio

PHYL:

1.43

FNGR:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

PHYL:

2.16

FNGR:

-0.44

Martin Ratio

PHYL:

11.12

FNGR:

-0.80

Ulcer Index

PHYL:

0.88%

FNGR:

51.33%

Daily Std Dev

PHYL:

4.71%

FNGR:

93.04%

Max Drawdown

PHYL:

-22.06%

FNGR:

-97.86%

Current Drawdown

PHYL:

-0.78%

FNGR:

-88.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYL achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than FNGR's 55.00% return.


PHYL

YTD

1.72%

1M

0.34%

6M

2.43%

1Y

9.86%

5Y*

6.75%

10Y*

N/A

FNGR

YTD

55.00%

1M

28.28%

6M

-4.12%

1Y

-48.04%

5Y*

44.29%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHYL vs. FNGR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHYL is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHYL is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHYL is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHYL is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHYL is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHYL is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGR is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGR is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGR is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGR is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGR is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGR is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PHYL vs. FNGR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and FingerMotion Inc (FNGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHYL, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
PHYL: 2.07
FNGR: -0.44
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHYL, currently valued at 2.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
PHYL: 2.88
FNGR: -0.07
The chart of Omega ratio for PHYL, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
PHYL: 1.43
FNGR: 0.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHYL, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
PHYL: 2.16
FNGR: -0.44
The chart of Martin ratio for PHYL, currently valued at 11.12, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
PHYL: 11.12
FNGR: -0.80

The current PHYL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the FNGR Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYL and FNGR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.07
-0.44
PHYL
FNGR

Dividends

PHYL vs. FNGR - Dividend Comparison

PHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, while FNGR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
PHYL
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF
8.04%8.28%7.62%6.55%6.13%7.51%7.30%1.79%
FNGR
FingerMotion Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PHYL vs. FNGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYL drawdown since its inception was -22.06%, smaller than the maximum FNGR drawdown of -97.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYL and FNGR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.78%
-88.38%
PHYL
FNGR

Volatility

PHYL vs. FNGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) is 3.26%, while FingerMotion Inc (FNGR) has a volatility of 31.53%. This indicates that PHYL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
3.26%
31.53%
PHYL
FNGR