PHYL vs. FNGR
PHYL (PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM, while FNGR (FingerMotion Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PHYL returned 3.85%/yr vs -46.44%/yr for FNGR. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PHYL vs. FNGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHYL achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than FNGR's -78.05% return.
PHYL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 4.95%
- 3Y*
- 8.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.85%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.34%
FNGR
- 1D
- 13.92%
- 1M
- -30.77%
- 6M
- -78.74%
- YTD
- -78.05%
- 1Y
- -82.80%
- 3Y*
- -63.05%
- 5Y*
- -46.44%
- 10Y*
- -4.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FNGR FingerMotion Inc | $421.10K | $287.83K | $592.83K |
| $11.83M | $9.14M | $6.26M |
PHYL vs. FNGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF | 1.43% | 9.65% | 8.45% | 11.91% | -11.80% | 6.20% | 6.31% | 16.77% | -4.17% |
FNGR FingerMotion Inc | -78.05% | 2.50% | -70.15% | 43.06% | -60.48% | -29.36% | 1,084.12% | -70.69% | -12.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHYL and FNGR is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHYL vs. FNGR — Risk / Return Rank
PHYL
FNGR
PHYL vs. FNGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and FingerMotion Inc (FNGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHYL | FNGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.79 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | -0.94 | +2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.21 | -1.73 | +9.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHYL vs. FNGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHYL drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum FNGR drawdown of -98.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYL and FNGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHYL | FNGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.07% | -98.52% | +76.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -88.82% | +86.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.53% | -96.97% | +92.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.11% | -97.35% | +81.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -98.31% | +97.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -63.53% | +60.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 48.21% | -47.60% |
Volatility
PHYL vs. FNGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) is 0.87%, while FingerMotion Inc (FNGR) has a volatility of 32.26%. This indicates that PHYL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHYL | FNGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 32.26% | -31.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 77.50% | -74.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 98.14% | -94.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.70% | 129.78% | -124.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 186.55% | -178.96% |
Dividends
PHYL vs. FNGR - Dividend Comparison
PHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, while FNGR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGR FingerMotion Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF | 7.01% | 7.05% | 8.28% | 7.62% | 6.55% | 6.13% | 7.51% | 7.31% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHYL and FNGR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGR has higher volatility (32.26%) compared to PHYL (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYL dropped -22.07% vs FNGR's -98.52%.
PHYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHYL and FNGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer