PHYL vs. FNGD
PHYL (PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF) and FNGD (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - PHYL is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Prudential, while FNGD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%). PHYL is actively managed, while FNGD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PHYL returned 3.88%/yr vs -62.88%/yr for FNGD. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. PHYL charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FNGD.
Performance
PHYL vs. FNGD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHYL achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than FNGD's -35.56% return.
PHYL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- —
FNGD
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -11.47%
- 6M
- -35.07%
- YTD
- -35.56%
- 1Y
- -49.24%
- 3Y*
- -65.19%
- 5Y*
- -62.88%
- 10Y*
- —
PHYL vs. FNGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF | 1.56% | 9.65% | 8.45% | 11.91% | -11.80% | 6.20% | 6.31% | 16.77% | -4.17% |
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -35.56% | -61.42% | -76.57% | -90.14% | 52.21% | -60.04% | -95.60% | -72.46% | 55.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHYL and FNGD is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018 | -0.51 |
The correlation between PHYL and FNGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.51 to -0.48 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHYL vs. FNGD — Risk / Return Rank
PHYL
FNGD
PHYL vs. FNGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHYL | FNGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.89 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | -0.75 | +2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.93 | -1.52 | +11.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHYL vs. FNGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHYL drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum FNGD drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYL and FNGD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHYL | FNGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.07% | -100.00% | +77.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -65.92% | +63.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.53% | -97.35% | +92.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.11% | -99.67% | +83.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -100.00% | +99.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -87.38% | +84.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 32.60% | -32.01% |
Volatility
PHYL vs. FNGD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) is 1.00%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a volatility of 25.56%. This indicates that PHYL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHYL | FNGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 25.56% | -24.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 53.43% | -50.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 65.22% | -61.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.70% | 89.65% | -83.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.61% | 91.07% | -83.46% |
PHYL vs. FNGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHYL has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHYL vs. FNGD - Dividend Comparison
PHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, while FNGD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF | 6.98% | 7.05% | 8.28% | 7.62% | 6.55% | 6.13% | 7.51% | 7.31% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHYL and FNGD have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGD has higher volatility (25.56%) compared to PHYL (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYL dropped -22.07% vs FNGD's -100.00%.
On 5-year performance, PHYL leads with 3.88% vs -62.88% for FNGD. On fees, PHYL is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, PHYL has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PHYL has performed better with a 3.88% return vs -62.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PHYL is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGD.
PHYL has the higher dividend yield at 6.98%, compared with 0.00% for FNGD.
PHYL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FNGD is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Prudential and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for PHYL and 0.95% for FNGD.
PHYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHYL and FNGD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer